Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 triples per page.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd abstract "Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd, [1979] 1 SCR 1067 is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the use of a defence of fair comment against an action for libel.An action for libel was brought by a Morris Cherneskey, an alderman for Saskatoon City Council, against the local Star-Phoenix newspaper for publishing a letter written by two law students criticizing Cherneskey for supporting the creation of an Alcoholic Rehabilitation Centre in a residential section of Saskatoon.In a six to three decision the Court held that a defence of fair comment is not possible when the editors themselves did not agree with the opinion of the letter and when there was no evidence that the authors of the letter submitted the letter in good faith. The Court stated that:The freedom of the journalist is an ordinary part of the freedom of the subject, and to whatever lengths the subject in general may go, so also may the journalist, but, apart from statute law, his privilege is no other and no higher. The responsibilities which attach to his power in the dissemination of printed matter may, and in the case of a conscientious journalist do, make him more careful; but the range of his assertions, his criticisms, or his comments is as wide as, and no wider than, that of any other subject. No privilege attaches to his position.".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 19791SCR1067.html.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 1978canlii20.html.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageID "3482621".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageLength "2489".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageOutDegree "7".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "644134893".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:1979_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Canadian_defamation_case_law.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Defamation.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Fair_comment.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Saskatoon_City_Council.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_Canada.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageWikiLinkText "Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd caseName "Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd citations "[1979] 1 SCR 1067".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd decidedDate "1978-11-21".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd dissent "Dickson J".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd fullCaseName "Morris T Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Limited and Sterling King".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd heardDate "--12-13".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd history "APPEAL from".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd joindissent "Spence and Estey JJ".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd joinmajority "Laskin CJ and Ritchie, Pigeon, Beetz and Pratte JJ".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd majority "Martland J".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd ruling "Appeal allowed and trial judgment restored".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd scc "1977".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_CanLII.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCC.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Italic_title.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd subject Category:1979_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd subject Category:Canadian_defamation_case_law.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd hypernym Decision.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd comment "Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd, [1979] 1 SCR 1067 is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the use of a defence of fair comment against an action for libel.An action for libel was brought by a Morris Cherneskey, an alderman for Saskatoon City Council, against the local Star-Phoenix newspaper for publishing a letter written by two law students criticizing Cherneskey for supporting the creation of an Alcoholic Rehabilitation Centre in a residential section of Saskatoon.In a six to three decision the Court held that a defence of fair comment is not possible when the editors themselves did not agree with the opinion of the letter and when there was no evidence that the authors of the letter submitted the letter in good faith. ".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd label "Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd".
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd sameAs Q5092034.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd sameAs m.09fw8x.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd sameAs Q5092034.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd?oldid=644134893.
- Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Cherneskey_v_Armadale_Publishers_Ltd.