Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bhartrharis_paradox> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 triples per page.
- Bhartrharis_paradox abstract "Bhartrhari's paradox is the title of a 1981 paper by Hans and Radhika Herzberger which drew attention to the discussion of self-referential paradoxes in the work Vākyapadīya attributed to Bhartṛhari, an Indian grammarian of the 5th century.In the chapter dealing with logical and linguistic relations, the Sambandha-samuddeśa, Bhartrhari discusses several statements of a paradoxical nature, including sarvam mithyā bravīmi \"everything I am saying is false\" which belongs to the liar paradox family, as well as the paradox arising from the statement that something is unnameable or unsignifiable (in Sanskrit: avācya): this becomes nameable or signifiable precisely by calling it unnameable or unsignifiable.Bhartrhari's interest lies not in strengthening this and other paradoxes by abstracting them from pragmatic context, but rather in exploring how a stubborn paradox may arise from unproblematic situations in daily communication.An unproblematic situation of communication is turned into a paradox — we have either contradiction (virodha) or infinite regress (anavasthā) — when abstraction is made from the functisignification and its extension in time, by accepting a simultaneous, opposite function (apara vyāpāra) undoing the previous one.For Bhartrhari it is important to analyse and solve the unsignifiability paradox because he holds that what cannot be signified may nevertheless be indicated (vyapadiśyate) and it may be understood (pratīyate) to exist.".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageID "45544774".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageLength "3842".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageOutDegree "14".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageRevisionID "679425276".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Bhartṛhari.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Bimal_Krishna_Matilal.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Category:Communication_of_falsehoods.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Category:Self-referential_paradoxes.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Category:Vyakarana.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Contradiction.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Infinite_regress.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Liar_paradox.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Paradox.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Proper_name_(philosophy).
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Radhika_Herzberger.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Self-reference.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Sign_(semiotics).
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLink Sphoṭa.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageWikiLinkText "Bhartrhari's paradox".
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Logical_paradoxes.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Merge.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Bhartrharis_paradox subject Category:Communication_of_falsehoods.
- Bhartrharis_paradox subject Category:Self-referential_paradoxes.
- Bhartrharis_paradox subject Category:Vyakarana.
- Bhartrharis_paradox hypernym Title.
- Bhartrharis_paradox comment "Bhartrhari's paradox is the title of a 1981 paper by Hans and Radhika Herzberger which drew attention to the discussion of self-referential paradoxes in the work Vākyapadīya attributed to Bhartṛhari, an Indian grammarian of the 5th century.In the chapter dealing with logical and linguistic relations, the Sambandha-samuddeśa, Bhartrhari discusses several statements of a paradoxical nature, including sarvam mithyā bravīmi \"everything I am saying is false\" which belongs to the liar paradox family, as well as the paradox arising from the statement that something is unnameable or unsignifiable (in Sanskrit: avācya): this becomes nameable or signifiable precisely by calling it unnameable or unsignifiable.Bhartrhari's interest lies not in strengthening this and other paradoxes by abstracting them from pragmatic context, but rather in exploring how a stubborn paradox may arise from unproblematic situations in daily communication.An unproblematic situation of communication is turned into a paradox — we have either contradiction (virodha) or infinite regress (anavasthā) — when abstraction is made from the functisignification and its extension in time, by accepting a simultaneous, opposite function (apara vyāpāra) undoing the previous one.For Bhartrhari it is important to analyse and solve the unsignifiability paradox because he holds that what cannot be signified may nevertheless be indicated (vyapadiśyate) and it may be understood (pratīyate) to exist.".
- Bhartrharis_paradox label "Bhartrhari's paradox".
- Bhartrharis_paradox sameAs Q20313275.
- Bhartrharis_paradox sameAs m.012z6_bc.
- Bhartrharis_paradox sameAs Q20313275.
- Bhartrharis_paradox wasDerivedFrom Bhartrharis_paradox?oldid=679425276.
- Bhartrharis_paradox isPrimaryTopicOf Bhartrharis_paradox.