Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 triples per page.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria abstract "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria (1964) 111 CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria, Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria thumbnail Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageExternalLink 111clr353.html.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageID "5634866".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageLength "1973".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageOutDegree "21".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageRevisionID "688993004".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Alan_Taylor_(judge).
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Australian_constitutional_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Category:1964_in_Australian_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Category:1964_in_case_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Category:Excise_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Commonwealth_Law_Reports.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Constitution_of_Australia.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Dennis_Hotels_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Douglas_Menzies.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Edward_McTiernan.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Frank_Kitto.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Garfield_Barwick.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink George_Winterton.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink High_Court_of_Australia.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Section_90_of_the_Constitution_of_Australia.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Substance_over_form.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLink Victor_Windeyer.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageWikiLinkText "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria citations 111clr353.html.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria court High_Court_of_Australia.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria dateDecided "1964-12-17".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria fullName "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria judges "Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Windeyer JJ".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria name "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria priorActions "none".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subsequentActions "none".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subject Category:1964_in_Australian_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subject Category:1964_in_case_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subject Category:Excise_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria hypernym Court.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria type Place.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria comment "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria (1964) 111 CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria, Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step.".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria label "Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria".
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria sameAs Q4753986.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria sameAs m.0dxfnq.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria sameAs Q4753986.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria wasDerivedFrom Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria?oldid=688993004.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria depiction Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg.
- Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria isPrimaryTopicOf Andersons_Pty_Ltd_v_Victoria.