Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 triples per page.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works abstract "Adfin (Pty) Ltd v Durable Engineering Works (Pty) Ltd is an important case in South African law, particularly in the area of civil procedure. An application to set aside the respondent's combined summons as an irregular proceeding, it was heard in the Cape Provincial Division by Berman J on 16 February 1990. Judgment was handed down on 2 March. The applicant's attorneys were Saacks & Jaffe; the respondent's were Bornman & Hayward. E. Sakinofsky appeared for the applicant and LM Olivier for the respondent.The case was a review of a decision by the Master to reject an objection to the liquidator's account. Proceedings were initiated by way of combined summons. The application was to set aside the combined summons as an irregular proceeding on the grounds that the provisions of Rule 53 of Uniform Rules of Court (providing that proceedings on review \"shall be by way of notice of motion\") and of section 407(4)(a) of the Companies Act (providing that a person aggrieved by the Master's direction may \"apply to Court\") required that proceedings be brought by way of notice of motion. The court dismissed application on the grounds that neither Rule 53 nor section 407(4)(a) rendered proceedings by way of notice of motion peremptory.".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageID "38721223".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageLength "4138".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageOutDegree "9".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageRevisionID "660947551".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Application_(law).
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Category:1990_in_South_African_law.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Category:1990_in_case_law.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Category:Western_Cape_Division_cases.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Civil_procedure.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Civil_procedure_in_South_Africa.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Combined_summons.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Law_of_South_Africa.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLink Western_Cape_Division.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageWikiLinkText "Adfin v Durable Engineering Works".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Use_South_African_English.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Use_dmy_dates.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works subject Category:1990_in_South_African_law.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works subject Category:1990_in_case_law.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works subject Category:Western_Cape_Division_cases.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works hypernym Case.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works comment "Adfin (Pty) Ltd v Durable Engineering Works (Pty) Ltd is an important case in South African law, particularly in the area of civil procedure. An application to set aside the respondent's combined summons as an irregular proceeding, it was heard in the Cape Provincial Division by Berman J on 16 February 1990. Judgment was handed down on 2 March. The applicant's attorneys were Saacks & Jaffe; the respondent's were Bornman & Hayward. E.".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works label "Adfin v Durable Engineering Works".
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works sameAs Q16058091.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works sameAs m.0rfb9w0.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works sameAs Q16058091.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works wasDerivedFrom Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works?oldid=660947551.
- Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works isPrimaryTopicOf Adfin_v_Durable_Engineering_Works.