Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court that since the District Court has issued neither an injunction nor an order granting or denying one, this Court has no jurisdiction under § 1253, which provides for review of orders granting or denying interlocutory or permanent injunctions. pp. 386–391."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 triples per page.
- Gunn_v._University_Committee_to_End_the_War_in_Viet_Nam abstract "Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court that since the District Court has issued neither an injunction nor an order granting or denying one, this Court has no jurisdiction under § 1253, which provides for review of orders granting or denying interlocutory or permanent injunctions. pp. 386–391.".
- Q5618919 abstract "Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court that since the District Court has issued neither an injunction nor an order granting or denying one, this Court has no jurisdiction under § 1253, which provides for review of orders granting or denying interlocutory or permanent injunctions. pp. 386–391.".
- Gunn_v._University_Committee_to_End_the_War_in_Viet_Nam comment "Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court that since the District Court has issued neither an injunction nor an order granting or denying one, this Court has no jurisdiction under § 1253, which provides for review of orders granting or denying interlocutory or permanent injunctions. pp. 386–391.".
- Q5618919 comment "Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court that since the District Court has issued neither an injunction nor an order granting or denying one, this Court has no jurisdiction under § 1253, which provides for review of orders granting or denying interlocutory or permanent injunctions. pp. 386–391.".