Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Androngo is a genus of skinks (family Scincidae). It contains a single species, Androngo trivittatus.It is usually placed in the subfamily Scincinae which seems to be paraphyletic however. Possibly fairly closely related to Paracontias and Amphiglossus, it belongs to a major clade which does not seem to include the type genus Scincus. Thus, it will probably be eventually assigned to a new, yet-to-be-named subfamily.(Austin & Arnold 2006)"@en }
Showing triples 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 triples per page.
- Androngo abstract "Androngo is a genus of skinks (family Scincidae). It contains a single species, Androngo trivittatus.It is usually placed in the subfamily Scincinae which seems to be paraphyletic however. Possibly fairly closely related to Paracontias and Amphiglossus, it belongs to a major clade which does not seem to include the type genus Scincus. Thus, it will probably be eventually assigned to a new, yet-to-be-named subfamily.(Austin & Arnold 2006)".
- Q1938451 abstract "Androngo is a genus of skinks (family Scincidae). It contains a single species, Androngo trivittatus.It is usually placed in the subfamily Scincinae which seems to be paraphyletic however. Possibly fairly closely related to Paracontias and Amphiglossus, it belongs to a major clade which does not seem to include the type genus Scincus. Thus, it will probably be eventually assigned to a new, yet-to-be-named subfamily.(Austin & Arnold 2006)".
- Androngo comment "Androngo is a genus of skinks (family Scincidae). It contains a single species, Androngo trivittatus.It is usually placed in the subfamily Scincinae which seems to be paraphyletic however. Possibly fairly closely related to Paracontias and Amphiglossus, it belongs to a major clade which does not seem to include the type genus Scincus. Thus, it will probably be eventually assigned to a new, yet-to-be-named subfamily.(Austin & Arnold 2006)".
- Q1938451 comment "Androngo is a genus of skinks (family Scincidae). It contains a single species, Androngo trivittatus.It is usually placed in the subfamily Scincinae which seems to be paraphyletic however. Possibly fairly closely related to Paracontias and Amphiglossus, it belongs to a major clade which does not seem to include the type genus Scincus. Thus, it will probably be eventually assigned to a new, yet-to-be-named subfamily.(Austin & Arnold 2006)".