Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 triples per page.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd abstract "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 468, also known as the Concrete Pipes Case, is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the scope of the corporations power in section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution. This was an important case in Australian constitutional law because it overruled the decision in the earlier case of Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, which held that the corporations power only extended as far as the regulation of their conduct in relation to their transactions with or affecting the public. Since this case, the Commonwealth has had at least the ability to regulate the trading activities of trading corporations, thus opening the way for an expansion in Commonwealth power.The width of this power was later considered again in the cases of Actors and Announcers Equity Association v Fontana Films (1982) 150 CLR 169, Commonwealth v Tasmania (the Tasmanian Dam Case) (1983) 158 CLR 1, Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner (1995) 183 CLR 323 and New South Wales v Commonwealth (the WorkChoices Case) (2006) 229 CLR 1.".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd thumbnail Australian_Coat_of_Arms.png?width=300.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 124clr468.html.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageID "4954116".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageLength "5504".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageOutDegree "32".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "636405472".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Actors_and_Announcers_Equity_Association_v_Fontana_Films.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Amalgamated_Society_of_Engineers_v_Adelaide_Steamship_Co._Ltd..
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Amalgamated_Society_of_Engineers_v_Adelaide_Steamship_Co_Ltd.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Australian_constitutional_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:1971_in_Australian_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:1971_in_case_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Corporations_power_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Commonwealth_Law_Reports.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Commonwealth_v_Tasmania.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Constitution_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Cyril_Walsh.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Douglas_Menzies.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Edward_McTiernan.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Garfield_Barwick.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink George_Winterton.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Harry_Gibbs.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink High_Court_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Huddart,_Parker_&_Co_Pty_Ltd_v_Moorehead.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink New_South_Wales_v_Commonwealth_(2006).
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Queensland.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Re_Dingjan;_Ex_parte_Wagner.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Reserved_State_powers.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Reserved_powers_doctrine.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Section_51(i)_of_the_Australian_Constitution.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Section_51(i)_of_the_Constitution_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Section_51(xx)_of_the_Australian_Constitution.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Section_51(xx)_of_the_Constitution_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Victor_Windeyer.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink William_Owen_(judge).
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLinkText "Concrete Pipes case".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageWikiLinkText "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd citations 124clr468.html.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd court High_Court_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd dateDecided "1971-09-03".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd fullName "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd hasPhotoCollection Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd judges "Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Menzies, Windeyer, Owen, Walsh and Gibbs JJ".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd name "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd opinions "The Trade Practices Act 1965 was incapable of being read down to be within Commonwealth legislative power on the basis that s 7, the "reading down" provision, required the Court to legislate rather than read down the law. The Court unanimously agreed that the restrictions placed over Commonwealth power to regulate constitutional corporations, from Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead 8 CLR 330, have been overturned, and the Commonwealth may regulate trading activities of trading corporations".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd priorActions "none".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subsequentActions "none".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:1971_in_Australian_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:1971_in_case_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:Corporations_power_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd hypernym Court.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd type Person.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd comment "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 468, also known as the Concrete Pipes Case, is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the scope of the corporations power in section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution.".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd label "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs m.0cwwzv.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs Q7623602.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs Q7623602.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd?oldid=636405472.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd depiction Australian_Coat_of_Arms.png.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd.