Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_JA> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 triples per page.
- R_v_JA abstract "R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A. and the Attorney General of Ontario), the Court heard from two interveners: the Attorney General of Canada and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).".
- R_v_JA wikiPageExternalLink page-184.html.
- R_v_JA wikiPageExternalLink 2011scc28.html.
- R_v_JA wikiPageID "31908111".
- R_v_JA wikiPageLength "9163".
- R_v_JA wikiPageOutDegree "33".
- R_v_JA wikiPageRevisionID "641507048".
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Alcohol_intoxication.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Assault.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Attorney_General_of_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Attorney_General_of_Ontario.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Beverley_McLachlin.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Category:2011_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Category:Canadian_criminal_case_law.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Category:Sex_crimes_in_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Consent_(criminal_law).
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Criminal_Code_of_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Criminal_law_of_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Epilepsy.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Erotic_asphyxiation.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Minister_of_Justice_(Canada).
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Morris_Fish.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Parliament_of_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Police.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Probation.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink R._v._Ewanchuk.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink R._v._Jobidon.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink R_v_Ewanchuk.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink R_v_Jobidon.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Rosie_DiManno.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Sexual_assault.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Spouse.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_Canada.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink The_Toronto_Star.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Toronto_Star.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Unconsciousness.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink University_of_Ottawa.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink University_of_Toronto.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLink Womens_Legal_Education_and_Action_Fund.
- R_v_JA wikiPageWikiLinkText "R v JA".
- R_v_JA caseName "R v JA".
- R_v_JA citations "2011".
- R_v_JA decidedDate "2011-05-27".
- R_v_JA dissent "Fish J.".
- R_v_JA docket "33684".
- R_v_JA fullCaseName "Her Majesty The Queen v JA".
- R_v_JA hasPhotoCollection R_v_JA.
- R_v_JA heardDate "2010-11-08".
- R_v_JA history "Judgment for the defendant in the Court of Appeal for Ontario.".
- R_v_JA joindissent "Binnie and LeBel JJ.".
- R_v_JA joinmajority "Deschamps, Abella, Charron, Rothstein, and Cromwell JJ.".
- R_v_JA majority "McLachlin C.J.".
- R_v_JA ratio "A person can only legally consent to sexual activity if they have an operating mind during the sexual activity in question. Therefore, performing sexual activity on an unconscious person is a criminal offence - whether or not the unconscious person consented in advance.".
- R_v_JA ruling "Appeal allowed and conviction entered".
- R_v_JA scc "2010".
- R_v_JA wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_CanLII.
- R_v_JA wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCCInfoBox.
- R_v_JA subject Category:2011_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R_v_JA subject Category:Canadian_criminal_case_law.
- R_v_JA subject Category:Sex_crimes_in_Canada.
- R_v_JA subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R_v_JA hypernym Decision.
- R_v_JA type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- R_v_JA comment "R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A.".
- R_v_JA label "R v JA".
- R_v_JA sameAs m.0gvrv67.
- R_v_JA sameAs Q7274240.
- R_v_JA sameAs Q7274240.
- R_v_JA wasDerivedFrom R_v_JA?oldid=641507048.
- R_v_JA isPrimaryTopicOf R_v_JA.