Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_B> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 triples per page.
- R_v_B abstract "R. v B. [1997] 2 Cr. App. R. 88, CA was a case in which the undisclosed party (B) was charged with an indecent assault on two of his grandsons.The evidence introduced in this case was pornographic magazines that belonged to the accused B. The House of Lords held this evidence to be inadmissible in suggesting that B had committed the assault. The magazines along with other evidence were not enough to convict B as they did not meet the proper criteria for the admissibility of what is known as similar fact evidence.As a result, in this case it is shown that evidence which only highlights the accused in question to be of a "bad disposition" will be deemed inadmissible. This is because, for evidence to be admissible, it must do more than just merely suggest that the person has the propensity to commit the charged crime.".
- R_v_B wikiPageID "20633457".
- R_v_B wikiPageLength "1374".
- R_v_B wikiPageOutDegree "10".
- R_v_B wikiPageRevisionID "641415620".
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Admissible_evidence.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Category:1997_in_British_law.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Category:1997_in_case_law.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Criminal_Appeal_Reports.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Evidence_(law).
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink House_of_Lords.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Indecent_assault.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLink Pornographic_magazine.
- R_v_B wikiPageWikiLinkText "R v B".
- R_v_B hasPhotoCollection R_v_B.
- R_v_B wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Multiple_issues.
- R_v_B wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- R_v_B subject Category:1997_in_British_law.
- R_v_B subject Category:1997_in_case_law.
- R_v_B subject Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- R_v_B type Article.
- R_v_B type Article.
- R_v_B comment "R. v B. [1997] 2 Cr. App. R. 88, CA was a case in which the undisclosed party (B) was charged with an indecent assault on two of his grandsons.The evidence introduced in this case was pornographic magazines that belonged to the accused B. The House of Lords held this evidence to be inadmissible in suggesting that B had committed the assault.".
- R_v_B label "R v B".
- R_v_B sameAs m.0524h47.
- R_v_B sameAs Q7278238.
- R_v_B sameAs Q7278238.
- R_v_B wasDerivedFrom R_v_B?oldid=641415620.
- R_v_B isPrimaryTopicOf R_v_B.