Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Loop_v._Litchfield> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 triples per page.
- Loop_v._Litchfield abstract "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA91,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA112,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA58,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageID "23460149".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageLength "3196".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageOutDegree "10".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageRevisionID "644648644".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:1870_in_New_York.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:1870_in_United_States_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:New_York_state_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:Product_liability_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_contract_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_tort_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Losee_v._Clute.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Privity.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Product_liability.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Products_liability.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLink Thomas_v._Winchester.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageWikiLinkText "Loop v. Litchfield".
- Loop_v._Litchfield hasPhotoCollection Loop_v._Litchfield.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:1870_in_New_York.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:1870_in_United_States_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:New_York_state_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:Product_liability_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:United_States_contract_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:United_States_tort_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield comment "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".
- Loop_v._Litchfield label "Loop v. Litchfield".
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs m.0640x2v.
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs Q6675867.
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs Q6675867.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wasDerivedFrom Loop_v._Litchfield?oldid=644648644.
- Loop_v._Litchfield isPrimaryTopicOf Loop_v._Litchfield.