Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judicial_immunity> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 triples per page.
- Judicial_immunity abstract "Judicial Immunity is a form of controversial legal immunity which protects judges and others employed by the judiciary from liability resulting from their judicial actions, no matter how incompetent, negligent, malicious, or unlawful (i.e. corrupt) such conduct might be.An example of applying judicial immunity: a judge is not liable for a slander or libel suit for statements made about someone during a trial, no matter how corrupt that act was.Judicial Immunity is the foundation of judicial tyranny, as legislation-from-the-bench effectively usurped the DOJ/FBI's (Executive Branch) checks-and-balances power to investigate and criminally-prosecute judicial officers disgracing the jurisprudence. Judicial immunity allows criminal exploitation of immune judicial officers since they can serve as "immune criminal proxies" on behalf of criminal intent. This reality positions judicial officers "in harm's way" since if compromised by criminal intent (blackmail, threat, extortion, etc.), the compromised judicial officer can then be used to commit criminal offenses "by proxy", permitting criminal enterprise to benefit from "judicial immunity". To that extent, the very premise of Judicial Immunity introduces "a bug into the system." Furthermore, judicial immunity establishes a terroristic threat to each and every American potentially-harmed by criminal acts perpetrated by judicial officers. For example, an impatient or incompetent judge orders his/her subordinate judicial assistant to, "rubber stamp my orders from a particular counsel to 'save time', regardless of opposition's motions or orders, and bring me the stamped executed orders for my blue ink signature later". This direction establishes "undue process" since the judicial assistant is executing orders blindly without consideration of hearing content, evidence, testimony, facts, law, etc. In other words, the victim litigant is not realizing "due process" by paying for it, but continually-burdened with the time, stress, and financial expenses associated with "proving their innocence" through an Appeals process. This cycle of undue process can then be used by a dishonest, criminal, or compromised judicial officer in local courts to bankrupt a target litigant, effectively rendering the victim Pro Se ( self-represented ), and at that point eviscerating the victim's active legal rights for no legitimate reason. All of this judicial malfeasance protected by the dishonest theory of, "Judicial Immunity". Efforts to abolish "judicial immunity" by national referendum are under way. The notion "Judicial officers could not receive due process, or fair hearings, in a court of competent jurisdiction, therefore they cannot be subjected to criminal prosecutions" is paradoxically-baseless argument.Judicial immunity is stated as providing "the maximum ability [of judges] to deal fearlessly and impartially with the public". The justification is as follows: because of the likelihood of innocent individuals being convicted in a court of law under false claims, the "burden" of being subjected to a court of law (a trial) would "dampen" the judges "enthusiasm" or "passion". Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 (1959). Opponents of judicial immunity argue that this doctrine is not adequately justified. For example, judges could be shielded from any personal capacity liability, and still be subject to official capacity liability so that they may be held accountable for their injurious acts -- thus "balancing" the "evil" to better protect the fundamental rights of victims. In reality, the abolishment of judicial immunity would cause little effect to judicial officers who conduct themselves with the highest levels of ethics and integrity. So, judicial immunity is a dishonest attempt for the judiciary to usurp cross-branch checks-and-balances, and therefore, should be abolished.Judicial immunity does not protect judges from suits stemming from administrative decisions made while off the bench, like hiring and firing decisions. But immunity generally does extend to all judicial decisions in which the judge has proper jurisdiction, even if a decision is made with "corrupt or malicious intent." In 1997 West Virginia judge Troisi became so irritated with a rude defendant, he stepped down from the bench, took off his robe, and bit the defendant on the nose. He pleaded no contest to state charges but was acquitted of federal charges of violating the defendants civil rights. He spent five days in jail and was put on probation.Historically, judicial immunity was associated with the English common law idea that "the King can do no wrong." (Compare Sovereign immunity.) Judges, the King's delegates for dispensing justice, accordingly "ought not to be drawn into question for any supposed corruption [for this tends] to the slander of the justice of the King."".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageExternalLink article9741-the-horrifying-extent-of-absolute-judicial-immunity.html.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageID "4525019".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageLength "9812".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageOutDegree "18".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageRevisionID "681479305".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Category:Immunity_(law).
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Common_law.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Defamation.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink En_banc.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Immunity.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Immunity_(disambiguation).
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Judge.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Judicial_activism.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Judicial_misconduct.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Judicial_tyranny.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Judiciary.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Libel.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Pro_Se.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Pro_se_legal_representation_in_the_United_States.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Slander.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Sovereign_immunity.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Stump_v._Sparkman.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLink West_Virginia.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "Judicial immunity".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "immunities".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "immunity".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "judges".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "judicial immunity".
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageWikiLinkText "judicial".
- Judicial_immunity hasPhotoCollection Judicial_immunity.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cleanup.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Main.
- Judicial_immunity wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Judicial_immunity subject Category:Immunity_(law).
- Judicial_immunity hypernym Form.
- Judicial_immunity type Article.
- Judicial_immunity type Article.
- Judicial_immunity type Page.
- Judicial_immunity type Term.
- Judicial_immunity comment "Judicial Immunity is a form of controversial legal immunity which protects judges and others employed by the judiciary from liability resulting from their judicial actions, no matter how incompetent, negligent, malicious, or unlawful (i.e.".
- Judicial_immunity label "Judicial immunity".
- Judicial_immunity sameAs مصونیت_قضایی.
- Judicial_immunity sameAs Immunitet_sądowy.
- Judicial_immunity sameAs m.0c73vh.
- Judicial_immunity sameAs Q6302979.
- Judicial_immunity sameAs Q6302979.
- Judicial_immunity wasDerivedFrom Judicial_immunity?oldid=681479305.
- Judicial_immunity isPrimaryTopicOf Judicial_immunity.