Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous.""@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Loop_v._Litchfield abstract "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".
- Loop_v._Litchfield comment "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".