Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 triples per page.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York abstract "Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 519 U.S. 357 (1997), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court related to legal protection of access to abortion. It ruled in an 8-1 decision that "floating buffer zones" preventing protesters approaching people entering or leaving abortion clinics were unconstitutional, though "fixed buffer zones" around the clinics themselves remained constitutional. The Court's upholding the fixed buffer was the most important aspect of the ruling, because it was a common feature of injunctions nationwide.Paul Schenck challenged a Federal District Court injunction that restricted "sidewalk counselors" from approaching abortion clinic patients and others with Bibles, tracts and pro-life messages. Because these protesters often violently harassed and intimidated patients and staff or prevented them from entering the clinic, the Court upheld the fixed buffer zone around the clinics, although it struck down the floating buffer zone around individuals because its indefinite and movable nature made it difficult to administer and risked overly restricting free speech.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wikiPageExternalLink prochoicenetwork.html.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wikiPageExternalLink 95-1065.ZS.html.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wikiPageExternalLink abortion_10-16a.html.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wikiPageID "3742909".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wikiPageRevisionID "598287864".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York arguedate "--10-16".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York argueyear "1996".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York citation "117".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York dissent "Breyer".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York dissent "Scalia".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York decidedate "--02-19".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York decideyear "1997".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York fullname "Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders, Petitioners".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York fullname "Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, et al.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York fullname "v.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York hasPhotoCollection Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York holding "The injunction provisions imposing "fixed buffer zone" limitations are constitutional, but the provisions imposing "floating buffer zone" limitations violate the First Amendment.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York dissent "Kennedy, Thomas".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York joinmajority "unanimous court".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York litigants "Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York majority "Rehnquist".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York scotus "1994".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York uspage "357".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York usvol "519".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York subject Category:1997_in_United_States_case_law.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York subject Category:United_States_abortion_case_law.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type Case.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type LegalCase.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type UnitOfWork.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type Event.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York type Situation.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York comment "Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 519 U.S. 357 (1997), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court related to legal protection of access to abortion. It ruled in an 8-1 decision that "floating buffer zones" preventing protesters approaching people entering or leaving abortion clinics were unconstitutional, though "fixed buffer zones" around the clinics themselves remained constitutional.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York label "Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York sameAs m.09yl8q.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York sameAs Q7431144.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York sameAs Q7431144.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York wasDerivedFrom Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York?oldid=598287864.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York isPrimaryTopicOf Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York.
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York name "Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders, Petitioners".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York name "Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, et al.".
- Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York name "v.".