DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data> ?p ?o }

• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data abstract "In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013), was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the government can access cell site records without a warrant. Specifically, the court held that court orders under the Stored Communications Act compelling cell phone providers to disclose historical cell site information are not per se unconstitutional.Section 2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act allows law enforcement agents to obtain court orders for cell site information without a warrant. Privacy advocates argued that the Act was unconstitutional because it violated callers' reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment. The court held that cell site information is a "business record" that callers voluntarily convey to their phone service providers. Since information voluntarily conveyed to third parties receives weaker protection under the Fourth Amendment, the court held that section 2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act is not per se unconstitutional.The New York Times called the case "a significant victory for law enforcement." The Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote that the opinion was based on a "misguided belief that a user understands and voluntarily chooses to reveal their location to the cell phone provider and ultimately the government through the user's own free will."".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wikiPageExternalLink hughesorder1116.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wikiPageExternalLink Smith-Opinion-CSLI-SDTX.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wikiPageExternalLink in_re_application_of_us_for_cell_site_data.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wikiPageID "42111154".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wikiPageRevisionID "604710196".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data case "172800.0".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data case "25920.0".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data case "In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, Case 4:11-mc-00223".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data citations "25920.0".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data course "Education_Program:University_of_California,_Berkeley/Cyberlaw_".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data courtseal "US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data decidedate "--07-30".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data decideyear "2013".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data dissent James_L._Dennis.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data holding "Court orders under the Stored Communications Act compelling cell phone service providers to disclose historical cell site location information are not per se unconstitutional.".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data joinmajority Thomas_Morrow_Reavley.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data judges Edith_Brown_Clement.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data judges James_L._Dennis.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data judges Thomas_Morrow_Reavley.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data lawsapplied Stored_Communications_Act.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data litigants "In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data majority Edith_Brown_Clement.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherSource "Electronic Frontier Foundation".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherSource "Electronic Privacy Information Center".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherSource "Wall Street Journal".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherUrl hughesorder1116.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherUrl Smith-Opinion-CSLI-SDTX.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data otherUrl in_re_application_of_us_for_cell_site_data.pdf.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data project "WikiProject Cyberlaw".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data term "2014".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data university "University of California, Berkeley".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:2013_in_United_States_case_law.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:Search_and_seizure_case_law.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:Surveillance.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:United_States_courts_of_appeals_cases.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data subject Category:United_States_privacy_case_law.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data comment "In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013), was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the government can access cell site records without a warrant.".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data label "In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data".
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data sameAs m.0_x8z2x.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data sameAs Q17055941.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data sameAs Q17055941.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data wasDerivedFrom In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data?oldid=604710196.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png.
• In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data isPrimaryTopicOf In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data.