Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s <http://dbpedia.org/property/holding> ?o }
- Arizona_v._Hicks holding "Police require probable cause to seize items in plain view.".
- Arizona_v._Inter_Tribal_Council_of_Arizona,_Inc. holding "Arizona’s evidence-of-citizenship requirement, as applied to Federal Form applicants, is pre-empted by the National Voter Registration Act's mandate that States “accept and use” the Federal Form.".
- Arizona_v._Johnson holding "Police may conduct a patdown search of a passenger in a stopped automobile if they reasonably suspect that the passenger is armed and dangerous.".
- Arizona_v._Maricopa_County_Medical_Society holding "The maximum fee agreements, as price-fixing agreements, are per se unlawful under § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.".
- Arizona_v._New_Mexico holding "Motion denied as an action involving the same constitutional issues had been filed in state court which provided an appropriate forum to litigate the issues.".
- Arizona_v._United_States holding "An Arizona law providing authority for local law enforcement to enforce immigration law violated the enumerated powers of Congress and is pre-empted by federal statute. Arizona law enforcement may inquire about a resident's legal status during lawful encounters, but may not implement its own immigration rules. Ninth Circuit affirmed and reversed in part.".
- Arizona_v._Youngblood holding "Unless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.".
- Arkansas_Best_Corp._v._Commissioner holding "Loss arising from sale of stock is capital loss, regardless of taxpayer's motive in purchasing the stock.".
- Arkansas_Department_of_Human_Services_v._Ahlborn holding "Under federal Medicaid law, a state cannot assert a lien on a benefit recipient's litigation settlement beyond the amount attributable to payment for past medical expenses. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.".
- Arkansas_Department_of_Human_Services_v._Cole holding "The prohibition of unmarried couples from adoption infringed on the privacy rights of unmarried opposite, and same-sex couples found in the Arkansas Constitution.".
- Arkansas_Game_&_Fish_Commission_v._United_States holding "Government-induced recurrent floodings, even if temporary in duration, are not categorically exempt from Takings Clause liability. Federal Circuit reversed and remanded.".
- Arkansas_v._Sanders holding "Absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception.".
- Arlington_Central_School_District_Board_of_Education_v._Murphy holding "Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded".
- Arlington_County_v._White holding "The county government exceeded its state-granted power to provide benefits to its employees by expanding the definition of covered dependents to include unmarried partners. Arlington County Circuit Court affirmed.".
- Arnett_v._Kennedy holding "Post-termination procedures provided by the Civil Service Commission and Office of Economic Opportunity were found to have adequately protected appellee's liberty interests. In addition, the Lloyd-La Follette Act was neither impermissibly vague or overbroad.".
- Arrowsmith_v._Commissioner holding "The taxpayers are limited to deducting capital losses, since they were required to pay the judgment because of liability imposed on them as transferees of liquidation distribution assets.".
- Arthur_Andersen_LLP_v._United_States holding "The jury instructions failed to convey properly the elements of a "corrup[t] persuas[ion]" conviction under §1512.".
- Artuz_v._Bennett holding "An application for state postconviction relief containing procedurally barred claims is filed within the meaning of the AEDPA.".
- Asahi_Metal_Industry_Co._v._Superior_Court holding "Considering the international context, the heavy burden on the alien defendant, and the slight interests of the plaintiff and the forum State, the exercise of personal jurisdiction by a California court over Asahi in this instance would be unreasonable and unfair.".
- Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition holding "The Court held that the two above provisions were unconstitutional because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech." United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.".
- Ashcroft_v._Iqbal holding "The heightened fact pleading standards, as required by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, was extended to all Federal court cases".
- Ashcroft_v._Iqbal holding "Top government officials are not liable for the actions of their subordinates absent evidence that they ordered the allegedly discriminatory activity.".
- Ashcroft_v._al-Kidd holding "--09-11".
- Ashe_v._Swenson holding "When an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.".
- Ashwander_v._Tennessee_Valley_Authority holding "Congress did not abuse its power with the Tennessee Valley Authority, a government corporation established as part of the New Deal to improve the economy of the state.".
- Aspen_Skiing_Co._v._Aspen_Highlands_Skiing_Corp. holding "The Court held that the evidence supported the jury verdict that Aspen Skiing violated § 2 of the Sherman Act and affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals.".
- Associated_Press_v._Meltwater_U.S._Holdings,_Inc. holding "The court held that Meltwater's copying was not protected under the fair use doctrine and it was infringing on AP's copyright.".
- Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics,_Inc. holding "Naturally occurring DNA sequences, even when isolated from the body, cannot be patented, but artificially created DNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring.".
- Astrue_v._Capato holding "The SSA’s reading is better attuned to the statute’s text and its design to benefit primarily those supported by the deceased wage earner in his or her lifetime. Moreover, even if the SSA’s longstanding interpretation is not the only reasonable one, it is at least a permissible construction entitled to deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.. Third Circuit reversed and remanded.".
- Atari_Games_Corp._v._Nintendo_of_America_Inc. holding "Atari was held liable for copyright infringement, affirming the district court's decision.".
- Atascadero_State_Hospital_v._Scanlon holding "California's acceptance of funds and participation in programs funded under the Rehabilitation Act are insufficient to establish that it consented to suit in federal court.".
- Atkins_v._Virginia holding "A Virginia law allowing the execution of mentally handicapped individuals violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments. Supreme Court of Virginia reversed and remanded.".
- Atkinson_Trading_Co._v._Shirley holding "The Navajo Nation's imposition of a hotel occupancy tax upon nonmembers on non-Indian fee land within its reservation is invalid".
- Atlantic_Marine_Construction_Co._v._United_States_District_Court holding "A forum selection clause may be enforced by a motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404. When such a motion is filed, the district court should transfer the case except in limited and extraordinary circumstances.".
- Atwater_v._City_of_Lago_Vista holding "Police may make a warrantless arrest when someone commits a misdemeanor offense.".
- Auer_v._Robbins holding "Sergeants and Lieutenants are exempt for the Federal Labor Standards Act.".
- Austin_v._Michigan_Chamber_of_Commerce holding "The Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to support or oppose candidates in elections, did not violate the First or the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Avery_v._Midland_County holding "The Court struck down local governmental districts inequality based their decision on the principle of "one man, one vote."".
- Ayotte_v._Planned_Parenthood_of_Northern_New_England holding "Completely invalidating a parental notification statute was unnecessary if its potentially unconstitutional applications could be addressed by more targeted judicial remedies. First Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded.".
- BMW_of_North_America,_Inc._v._Gore holding "Excessive punitive damages awards violate substantive due process.".
- BP_America_Production_Co._v._Burton holding "A statute of limitations on government actions for contract claims does not applies to actions by a federal administrative agency to recover royalties on federal oil and gas leases.".
- Babbitt_v._Sweet_Home_Chapter_of_Communities_for_a_Great_Oregon holding "The Secretary's definition of "harm," within the meaning of the Endangered Species Act defines "take," as including "significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or injures wildlife," was reasonable.".
- Babbitt_v._Youpee holding "a provision which escheats property to tribe upon owner's death any fractional interest in allotment which constitutes less than two percent of the allotment and has not produced $100 in income over the past five years, unless it is devised or descends to owner of another fractional interest in the allotment, works an unconstitutional taking".
- Babcock_v._Jackson holding "The law of the jurisdiction governs that has the strongest interest in the resolution of the particular issue presented. Appellate Division reversed.".
- Bad_Elk_v._United_States holding "Held that an individual had the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest and was entitled to a jury instruction to that effect.".
- Baggett_v._Bullitt holding "A State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred.".
- Bailey_v._Drexel_Furniture_Co. holding "Congress improperly penalized employers for using child labor.".
- Bailey_v._United_States holding ""Use" of a firearm during or in relation to a drug crime or a crime of violence requires active employment of the firearm and not mere possession.".
- Bailey_v._United_States_(2013) holding "Suspect who had left property in vehicle prior to search was no longer in immediate vicinity when detained almost a mile away, thus no interests of law enforcement justified detention; evidence obtained from suspect that supported conviction was thus unconstitutionally obtained. Second Circuit reversed and remanded.".
- Bailiff_v._Tipping holding "A writ of error must have a citation.".
- Baird_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona holding "A State's power to inquire about a person's beliefs or associations is limited by the First Amendment, which prohibits a State from excluding a person from a profession solely because of membership in a political organization or because of his beliefs.".
- Baker_v._Carr holding "The redistricting of state legislative districts is not a political question, and thus is justiciable by the federal courts.".
- Baker_v._Nelson holding "The denial of marriage licenses to same-sex couples does not violate provisions of the United States Constitution".
- Baker_v._Selden holding "Exclusive rights to the "useful art" described in a book are only available by patent. The description itself is protectable by copyright.".
- Baldwin_v._Fish_&_Game_Commission_of_Montana holding "Recreational hunting is not a fundamental right and therefore is not within the purview of privileges and immunities clause. The Montana statutory does not violate the equal protection clause.".
- Baldwin_v._G.A.F._Seelig,_Inc. holding "It is a violation of the Commerce Clause for a state to regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce.".
- Ballew_v._Georgia holding "A criminal conviction based on a five person jury is unconstitutional, the minimum size for a jury hearing a petty offense is six.".
- Baltimore_&_Ohio_Railroad_Co._v._United_States holding "An implied in fact contract exists as, an agreement founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding.".
- Baltimore_Gas_&_Electric_Co._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc. holding "NRC rule that nuclear plant licensing hearings would assume that the permanent storage of nuclear waste would have no environmental impact held valid.".
- Balzac_v._Porto_Rico holding "Sixth Amendment protections do not apply to unincorporated territories of the United States.".
- Banamex_v._Narco_News holding "Dismissed".
- Banco_Nacional_de_Cuba_v._Sabbatino holding "The Court determined that the policy of United States federal courts would be to honor the Act of State Doctrine, which dictates that the propriety of decisions of other countries relating to their internal affairs would not be questioned in the courts of the United States.".
- Bank_of_America_National_Trust_&_Savings_Assn_v._203_North_LaSalle_Street_Partnership holding "A debtor's prebankruptcy equity holders may not, over the objection of a senior class of impaired creditors, contribute new capital and receive ownership interests in the reorganized entity, when that opportunity is given exclusively to the old equity holders under a plan adopted without consideration of alternatives.".
- Barber_v._Thomas holding "4665600.0".
- Barefoot_v._Estelle holding "There is no merit to petitioner's argument that psychiatrists, individually and as a group, are incompetent to predict with an acceptable degree of reliability that a particular criminal will commit other crimes in the future, and so represent a danger to the community.".
- Barker_v._Wingo holding "Determinations of whether the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated must be done on a case-by-case basis.".
- Barnes-Wallace_v._Boy_Scouts_of_America holding "The leases do no violate the No Aid Clause or the No Preference Clause of the California Constitution, or the federal Establishment Clause".
- Barnes_v._Glen_Theatre,_Inc. holding "States have the authority and right to regulate and/or ban nudity, as it is in the interests of both the government and society to preserve morality by statute. Nudity is not protected under the first amendment, nor expressive content. District court affirmed.".
- Barnes_v._Yahoo!,_Inc. holding "The Ninth Circuit dismissed Barnes' complaints, holding that Yahoo!, Inc. was immune from liability pursuant to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This decision ultimately reversed the decision from the lower court in Oregon by granting Yahoo! the motion to dismiss.".
- Barnett_Bank_of_Marion_County,_N.A._v._Nelson holding "The court said states could manage national banks when “doing so does not prevent or significantly interfere with the national bank’s exercise of its powers" which is called conflict preemption.".
- Barr_v._City_of_Columbia holding "The state breach of the peace convictions could not stand as there was no evidence to support them, and the criminal trespass convictions were reversed for the reasons stated in Bouie v. City of Columbia.".
- Barrett_v._United_States holding "South Carolina had not been divided into separate federal judicial districts.".
- Barron_v._Baltimore holding "State governments are not bound by the Fifth Amendment's requirement for just compensation in cases of eminent domain.".
- Bartkus_v._Illinois holding "Coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Bartlett_v._Strickland holding "A minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before §2 of the Voting Rights Act would require the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group’s votes.".
- Bartnicki_v._Vopper holding "A broadcaster cannot be held civilly liable for publishing documents or tapes illegally procured by a third-party.".
- Basic_Inc._v._Levinson holding "Plaintiffs are entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in a 10b-5 case, based on a fraud-on-the-market theory.".
- Baskin_v._Bogan holding "The district court's decision is affirmed.".
- Bates_v._City_of_Little_Rock holding "State governments cannot compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists when it inhibits freedom of association.".
- Bates_v._Dow_Agrosciences_LLC holding "Federal law does not preempt the application of state law in insecticide labeling requirements. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned.".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona holding "The First Amendment allows lawyers to advertise in a manner that is not misleading to members of the general public.".
- Batman_v._Commissioner holding "Partnership was not formed between petitioner and minor son since all activities that formed it were initiated by petitioner, not son, and record did not suggest any involvement by son in creating partnership, therefore farm income from both years in dispute is taxed as individual income. United States Tax Court affirmed.".
- Batson_v._Kentucky holding "Strauder v. West Virginia reaffirmed; prosecutors may not use race as a factor in making peremptory challenges; defendants must only make a prima facie showing on the evidence from their case to mount a challenge to race-based use of peremptories.".
- Baxter_v._Montana holding "While the State Constitution did not guarantee a right to physician-assisted suicide, there was "nothing in Montana Supreme Court precedent or Montana statutes indicating that physician aid in dying is against public policy."".
- Baze_v._Rees holding "Cocktail using three drugs for execution by lethal injection in Kentucky is constitutional under the Eighth Amendment. Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed.".
- Beacon_Theatres,_Inc._v._Westover holding "Only under the most imperative circumstances can right to jury trial of legal issues be lost through prior determination of equitable claims.".
- Beal_v._Doe holding "The constitutionally protected right of abortion does not mean that states have to treat potential motherhood and abortion in the same manner.".
- Beard_v._Banks holding "Prison officials had adequate legal support for their policy of withholding reading material from incorrigible inmates.".
- Beard_v._Kindler holding "A state procedural rule that is enforced by the state courts cannot be reviewed in federal court.".
- Beauharnais_v._Illinois holding "The Court upheld an Illinois law making it illegal to publish or exhibit any writing or picture portraying the "depravity, criminality, unchastity, or lack of virtue of a class of citizens of any race, color, creed or religion."".
- Beck_v._Alabama holding "The death sentence may not constitutionally be imposed after a jury verdict of guilt of a capital offense where the jury was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included offense.".
- Beck_v._Ohio holding "No probable cause for petitioner's arrest having been shown, the arrest, and therefore necessarily the search for and seizure of the slips incident thereto, were invalid under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments".
- Beech_Aircraft_Corp._v._Rainey holding "Portions of investigatory reports otherwise admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 803 are not inadmissible merely because they state a conclusion or opinion.".
- Begay_v._United_States holding "Felony driving while intoxicated is not a “violent felony” within meaning of section of the Armed Career Criminal Act imposing special mandatory 15-year prison term upon felons who unlawfully possess a firearm and who have three or more convictions for violent felonies.".
- Beghal_v_DPP holding "Appeal dismissed, the powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 are proportionate.".
- Behrens_v._Pelletier holding "A defendant's immediate appeal of an unfavorable qualified-immunity ruling on a motion to dismiss does not deprive the court of appeals of jurisdiction over a second appeal, also based on qualified immunity, immediately following denial of summary judgment.".
- Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly holding "Parallel conduct alone, absent some evidence of agreement to engage in anti-competitive behavior, is not sufficient to prove a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act. A complaint must allege facts with sufficient specificity to state a claim for relief that is plausible, not merely conceivable, on its face.".
- Bell_v._Maryland holding "The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland to allow consideration whether a change in state law should result in dismissal of the convictions.".
- Bell_v._Wolfish holding "The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit strip searches and similar intrusive conduct against persons being held in federal prison while awaiting trial.".
- Bellotti_v._Baird_(1976) holding "Massachusetts law requiring parental consent was constitutional.".