Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Whitfield v. United States was a case that was decided 9-0 at the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 2015. The case concerned whether the forced accompaniment statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) applies when a bank, credit union, or savings/loan association robber, or attempted robber, forces someone to accompany them for any distance. Defense attorney Joshua B. Carpenter argued on behalf of the Petitioner, and Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian H."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Whitfield_v._United_States comment "Whitfield v. United States was a case that was decided 9-0 at the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 2015. The case concerned whether the forced accompaniment statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) applies when a bank, credit union, or savings/loan association robber, or attempted robber, forces someone to accompany them for any distance. Defense attorney Joshua B. Carpenter argued on behalf of the Petitioner, and Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian H.".
- Q19070319 comment "Whitfield v. United States was a case that was decided 9-0 at the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 2015. The case concerned whether the forced accompaniment statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) applies when a bank, credit union, or savings/loan association robber, or attempted robber, forces someone to accompany them for any distance. Defense attorney Joshua B. Carpenter argued on behalf of the Petitioner, and Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian H.".