Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "United States v. Bestfoods, No. 97-454 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the indirect liability of a parent corporation under CERCLA is to be determined by its control over a subsidiary's facility, rather than the relationship between the corporation and subsidiary."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 triples per page.
- United_States_v._Bestfoods abstract "United States v. Bestfoods, No. 97-454 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the indirect liability of a parent corporation under CERCLA is to be determined by its control over a subsidiary's facility, rather than the relationship between the corporation and subsidiary.".
- Q7893225 abstract "United States v. Bestfoods, No. 97-454 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the indirect liability of a parent corporation under CERCLA is to be determined by its control over a subsidiary's facility, rather than the relationship between the corporation and subsidiary.".
- United_States_v._Bestfoods comment "United States v. Bestfoods, No. 97-454 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the indirect liability of a parent corporation under CERCLA is to be determined by its control over a subsidiary's facility, rather than the relationship between the corporation and subsidiary.".
- Q7893225 comment "United States v. Bestfoods, No. 97-454 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the indirect liability of a parent corporation under CERCLA is to be determined by its control over a subsidiary's facility, rather than the relationship between the corporation and subsidiary.".