Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Stansbury v. California, No. 93-5770, 511 U.S. 318 (1994) is a US constitutional law case. The Supreme Court of the United States considered whether a police officer's subjective and undisclosed opinion whether a person who had been questioned was a suspect was relevant in determining whether that person had been in custody and thus entitled to the Miranda warnings. In a 9-0 ruling, the Court reversed and remanded the case."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Stansbury_v._California comment "Stansbury v. California, No. 93-5770, 511 U.S. 318 (1994) is a US constitutional law case. The Supreme Court of the United States considered whether a police officer's subjective and undisclosed opinion whether a person who had been questioned was a suspect was relevant in determining whether that person had been in custody and thus entitled to the Miranda warnings. In a 9-0 ruling, the Court reversed and remanded the case.".
- Q18392816 comment "Stansbury v. California, No. 93-5770, 511 U.S. 318 (1994) is a US constitutional law case. The Supreme Court of the United States considered whether a police officer's subjective and undisclosed opinion whether a person who had been questioned was a suspect was relevant in determining whether that person had been in custody and thus entitled to the Miranda warnings. In a 9-0 ruling, the Court reversed and remanded the case.".