DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "On May 19, 2006, the National Post of Canada published pieces by Amir Taheri alleging that the Iranian parliament had passed a sumptuary law mandating a national dress code for all Iranians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.Both National Post articles went on to say that non-Muslim religious minorities in Iran would be required to wear \"special insignia\": yellow for Jews, red for Christians and blue for Zoroastrian. According to the article by Taheri, \"[t]he new codes would enable Muslims to easily recognize non-Muslims so that they can avoid shaking hands with them by mistake, and thus becoming najis (unclean).\" According to both articles, Iranian Muslims would have to wear \"standard Islamic garments\".Numerous other sources, including Maurice Motamed, the Jewish member of the Iranian parliament and the Iranian Embassy in Canada, refuted the report as untrue. The National Post later retracted the original article (\"Iran eyes badges for Jews: Law would require non-Muslim insignia\") and published an article, to the contrary (\"Experts say reports of badges for Jews in Iran is untrue\").The original article listed only \"human rights groups\" and \"Iranian expatriates living in Canada\" as its sources. Amir Taheri made a statement on May 22 saying the National Post story he authored was used by \"a number of reports that somehow jumped the gun\" and that he stands by the article. Amir states he raised the issue \"not as a news story\" but rather \"as an opinion column\".The Associated Press later refuted the Post report as well, saying that \"a draft law moving through parliament encourages Iranians to wear Islamic clothing to protect the country's Muslim identity but does not mention special attire for religious minorities, according to a copy obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.\" Reuters also reported that \"A copy of the bill obtained by Reuters contained no such references. Reuters correspondents who followed the dress code session in parliament as it was broadcast on state radio heard no discussion of proscriptions for religious minorities.\"Finally on May 24, 2006, the National Post issues an apology for the untrue reports that the Iranian law would \"require Jews and other religious minorities in Iran to wear badges\". \"It is now clear the story is not true,\" wrote Editor-in-chief Douglas Kelly in a long editorial appearing on Page 2. \"We apologize for the mistake and for the consternation it has caused not just National Post readers, but the broader public who read the story.\""@en }

• 2006_Iranian_sumptuary_law_controversy abstract "On May 19, 2006, the National Post of Canada published pieces by Amir Taheri alleging that the Iranian parliament had passed a sumptuary law mandating a national dress code for all Iranians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.Both National Post articles went on to say that non-Muslim religious minorities in Iran would be required to wear \"special insignia\": yellow for Jews, red for Christians and blue for Zoroastrian. According to the article by Taheri, \"[t]he new codes would enable Muslims to easily recognize non-Muslims so that they can avoid shaking hands with them by mistake, and thus becoming najis (unclean).\" According to both articles, Iranian Muslims would have to wear \"standard Islamic garments\".Numerous other sources, including Maurice Motamed, the Jewish member of the Iranian parliament and the Iranian Embassy in Canada, refuted the report as untrue. The National Post later retracted the original article (\"Iran eyes badges for Jews: Law would require non-Muslim insignia\") and published an article, to the contrary (\"Experts say reports of badges for Jews in Iran is untrue\").The original article listed only \"human rights groups\" and \"Iranian expatriates living in Canada\" as its sources. Amir Taheri made a statement on May 22 saying the National Post story he authored was used by \"a number of reports that somehow jumped the gun\" and that he stands by the article. Amir states he raised the issue \"not as a news story\" but rather \"as an opinion column\".The Associated Press later refuted the Post report as well, saying that \"a draft law moving through parliament encourages Iranians to wear Islamic clothing to protect the country's Muslim identity but does not mention special attire for religious minorities, according to a copy obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.\" Reuters also reported that \"A copy of the bill obtained by Reuters contained no such references. Reuters correspondents who followed the dress code session in parliament as it was broadcast on state radio heard no discussion of proscriptions for religious minorities.\"Finally on May 24, 2006, the National Post issues an apology for the untrue reports that the Iranian law would \"require Jews and other religious minorities in Iran to wear badges\". \"It is now clear the story is not true,\" wrote Editor-in-chief Douglas Kelly in a long editorial appearing on Page 2. \"We apologize for the mistake and for the consternation it has caused not just National Post readers, but the broader public who read the story.\"".