Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission No. 15-534, 547 U.S. ___ (2015) was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law. The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates only has immunity from antitrust law when it is actively supervised by the state. The North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners had relied on the Parker immunity doctrine, established by the Supreme Court case Parker v. Brown, which held that actions by state governments acting in their sovereignty did not violate antitrust law."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- North_Carolina_State_Board_of_Dental_Examiners_v._FTC abstract "North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission No. 15-534, 547 U.S. ___ (2015) was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law. The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates only has immunity from antitrust law when it is actively supervised by the state. The North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners had relied on the Parker immunity doctrine, established by the Supreme Court case Parker v. Brown, which held that actions by state governments acting in their sovereignty did not violate antitrust law.".
- Q22023446 abstract "North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission No. 15-534, 547 U.S. ___ (2015) was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law. The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates only has immunity from antitrust law when it is actively supervised by the state. The North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners had relied on the Parker immunity doctrine, established by the Supreme Court case Parker v. Brown, which held that actions by state governments acting in their sovereignty did not violate antitrust law.".