Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Lotfi Raissi (Arabic: لطفي رئيسي, Luṭfī Rayissī; born April 4, 1974), was the first person charged in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks. However, in 2003 a British court ruled that the charges against Raissi were without evidence, and that he had no association with the attacks. In April 2010 it was announced that he was eligible for compensation, the amount of which was as yet undecided."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 triples per page.
- Lotfi_Raissi abstract "Lotfi Raissi (Arabic: لطفي رئيسي, Luṭfī Rayissī; born April 4, 1974), was the first person charged in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks. However, in 2003 a British court ruled that the charges against Raissi were without evidence, and that he had no association with the attacks. In April 2010 it was announced that he was eligible for compensation, the amount of which was as yet undecided.".
- Q3259995 abstract "Lotfi Raissi (Arabic: لطفي رئيسي, Luṭfī Rayissī; born April 4, 1974), was the first person charged in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks. However, in 2003 a British court ruled that the charges against Raissi were without evidence, and that he had no association with the attacks. In April 2010 it was announced that he was eligible for compensation, the amount of which was as yet undecided.".
- Lotfi_Raissi comment "Lotfi Raissi (Arabic: لطفي رئيسي, Luṭfī Rayissī; born April 4, 1974), was the first person charged in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks. However, in 2003 a British court ruled that the charges against Raissi were without evidence, and that he had no association with the attacks. In April 2010 it was announced that he was eligible for compensation, the amount of which was as yet undecided.".
- Q3259995 comment "Lotfi Raissi (Arabic: لطفي رئيسي, Luṭfī Rayissī; born April 4, 1974), was the first person charged in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks. However, in 2003 a British court ruled that the charges against Raissi were without evidence, and that he had no association with the attacks. In April 2010 it was announced that he was eligible for compensation, the amount of which was as yet undecided.".