Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "In Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), the United States Supreme Court reviewed a regulation under which the California Coastal Commission required that an offer to dedicate a lateral public easement along the Nollans' beachfront lot be recorded on the chain of title to the property as a condition of approval of a permit to demolish an existing bungalow and replace it with a three-bedroom house. The Coastal Commission had asserted that the public-easement condition was imposed to promote the legitimate state interest of diminishing the \"blockage of the view of the ocean\" caused by construction of the larger house. The Court held that in evaluating such claims, it must be determined whether an \"essential nexus\" exists between a legitimate state interest and the permit condition. In a controversial 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that a requirement by the CCC was a taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Nollan_v._California_Coastal_Commission abstract "In Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), the United States Supreme Court reviewed a regulation under which the California Coastal Commission required that an offer to dedicate a lateral public easement along the Nollans' beachfront lot be recorded on the chain of title to the property as a condition of approval of a permit to demolish an existing bungalow and replace it with a three-bedroom house. The Coastal Commission had asserted that the public-easement condition was imposed to promote the legitimate state interest of diminishing the \"blockage of the view of the ocean\" caused by construction of the larger house. The Court held that in evaluating such claims, it must be determined whether an \"essential nexus\" exists between a legitimate state interest and the permit condition. In a controversial 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that a requirement by the CCC was a taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.".