Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Gene C. Schaerr (born 15 April, 1957) is an American attorney. He is a veteran litigator in state and federal appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. He was previously a law clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and Antonin Scalia, and he has argued several cases before that Court.In 2014, he was chosen to represent the state of Utah as outside counsel in Kitchen v. Herbert, the state's legal action defending the traditional definition of marriage. In 2015, he also submitted an amici curiae brief on behalf of 100 scholars of marriage to the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark Supreme Court case on same-sex marriage. The brief argued, among other things, that consistent with patterns in European countries and American states that have adopted same-sex marriage, opposite-sex marriage rates will likely drop as a result of redefining marriage as a genderless institution. This will result, over the next fertility cycle (30 years), in fewer children born to married parents, fewer children born overall since unmarried women have lower birth rates, and more abortions since unmarried women have higher rates of abortion. Although the latter claim was criticized in various press outlets, Mr. Schaerr vigorously defended the brief and its use of decomposition analysis, a technique frequently used by demographers, on the blog Bench Memos."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Gene_Schaerr abstract "Gene C. Schaerr (born 15 April, 1957) is an American attorney. He is a veteran litigator in state and federal appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. He was previously a law clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and Antonin Scalia, and he has argued several cases before that Court.In 2014, he was chosen to represent the state of Utah as outside counsel in Kitchen v. Herbert, the state's legal action defending the traditional definition of marriage. In 2015, he also submitted an amici curiae brief on behalf of 100 scholars of marriage to the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark Supreme Court case on same-sex marriage. The brief argued, among other things, that consistent with patterns in European countries and American states that have adopted same-sex marriage, opposite-sex marriage rates will likely drop as a result of redefining marriage as a genderless institution. This will result, over the next fertility cycle (30 years), in fewer children born to married parents, fewer children born overall since unmarried women have lower birth rates, and more abortions since unmarried women have higher rates of abortion. Although the latter claim was criticized in various press outlets, Mr. Schaerr vigorously defended the brief and its use of decomposition analysis, a technique frequently used by demographers, on the blog Bench Memos.".
- Q19879976 abstract "Gene C. Schaerr (born 15 April, 1957) is an American attorney. He is a veteran litigator in state and federal appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. He was previously a law clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and Antonin Scalia, and he has argued several cases before that Court.In 2014, he was chosen to represent the state of Utah as outside counsel in Kitchen v. Herbert, the state's legal action defending the traditional definition of marriage. In 2015, he also submitted an amici curiae brief on behalf of 100 scholars of marriage to the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark Supreme Court case on same-sex marriage. The brief argued, among other things, that consistent with patterns in European countries and American states that have adopted same-sex marriage, opposite-sex marriage rates will likely drop as a result of redefining marriage as a genderless institution. This will result, over the next fertility cycle (30 years), in fewer children born to married parents, fewer children born overall since unmarried women have lower birth rates, and more abortions since unmarried women have higher rates of abortion. Although the latter claim was criticized in various press outlets, Mr. Schaerr vigorously defended the brief and its use of decomposition analysis, a technique frequently used by demographers, on the blog Bench Memos.".