Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining, commonly known by its acronym CRISP-DM, was a data mining process model that describes commonly used approaches that data mining experts use to tackle problems. Polls conducted at one and the same website (KDNuggests) in 2002, 2004, 2007 and 2014 show that it was the leading methodology used by industry data miners who decided to respond to the survey. The only other data mining standard named in these polls was SEMMA. However, 3-4 times as many people reported using CRISP-DM. A review and critique of data mining process models in 2009 called the CRISP-DM the \"de facto standard for developing data mining and knowledge discovery projects.\" Other reviews of CRISP-DM and data mining process models include Kurgan and Musilek's 2006 review, and Azevedo and Santos' 2008 comparison of CRISP-DM and SEMMA. Efforts to update the methodolgy started in 2006, but have As of 30 June 2015 not led to a new version, and the \"Special Interest Group\" (SIG) responsible along with the website has long disappeared (see History of CRISP-DM)."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Cross_Industry_Standard_Process_for_Data_Mining abstract "Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining, commonly known by its acronym CRISP-DM, was a data mining process model that describes commonly used approaches that data mining experts use to tackle problems. Polls conducted at one and the same website (KDNuggests) in 2002, 2004, 2007 and 2014 show that it was the leading methodology used by industry data miners who decided to respond to the survey. The only other data mining standard named in these polls was SEMMA. However, 3-4 times as many people reported using CRISP-DM. A review and critique of data mining process models in 2009 called the CRISP-DM the \"de facto standard for developing data mining and knowledge discovery projects.\" Other reviews of CRISP-DM and data mining process models include Kurgan and Musilek's 2006 review, and Azevedo and Santos' 2008 comparison of CRISP-DM and SEMMA. Efforts to update the methodolgy started in 2006, but have As of 30 June 2015 not led to a new version, and the \"Special Interest Group\" (SIG) responsible along with the website has long disappeared (see History of CRISP-DM).".