Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which, in a plurality decision, the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before §2 of the Voting Rights Act would require the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group’s votes. The decision struck down a North Carolina redistricting plan that attempted to preserve minority voting power in a state House of Representatives district that was 39 percent black. Justice Kennedy delivered the decision and was joined by Justices Alito and Roberts. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Scalia. Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer. Justices Ginsburg and Breyer also filed separate dissenting opinions."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Bartlett_v._Strickland abstract "Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which, in a plurality decision, the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before §2 of the Voting Rights Act would require the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group’s votes. The decision struck down a North Carolina redistricting plan that attempted to preserve minority voting power in a state House of Representatives district that was 39 percent black. Justice Kennedy delivered the decision and was joined by Justices Alito and Roberts. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Scalia. Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer. Justices Ginsburg and Breyer also filed separate dissenting opinions.".
- Q4865425 abstract "Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which, in a plurality decision, the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before §2 of the Voting Rights Act would require the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group’s votes. The decision struck down a North Carolina redistricting plan that attempted to preserve minority voting power in a state House of Representatives district that was 39 percent black. Justice Kennedy delivered the decision and was joined by Justices Alito and Roberts. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Scalia. Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer. Justices Ginsburg and Breyer also filed separate dissenting opinions.".