Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 triples per page.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd abstract "James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act.".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 0475_06_2102.html.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageID "15464563".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageLength "2570".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageOutDegree "12".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "637556211".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:2007_in_British_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:2007_in_case_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal_cases.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Employment_Appeal_Tribunal.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink McMeechan_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Employment.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Minimum_wage.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink National_Minimum_Wage_Act_1998.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink UK_labour_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink United_Kingdom_labour_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Worker.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Workforce.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageWikiLinkText "James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd citations "[2007] UKEAT 0475_06_2102, [2007] ICR 1006, [2007] IRLR 296".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd court Employment_Appeal_Tribunal.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd dateDecided "2007-02-21".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd hasPhotoCollection James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd keywords Minimum_wage.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd keywords Worker.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd keywords Workforce.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd name "James v Redcats Ltd".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd opinions "Elias J".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Clist_wage.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_Court_Case.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:UK_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd subject Category:2007_in_British_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd subject Category:2007_in_case_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd subject Category:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal_cases.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd subject Category:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd hypernym Case.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd type Person.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd comment "James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act.".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd label "James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd".
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd sameAs m.03mb50p.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd sameAs Q16850926.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd sameAs Q16850926.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd wasDerivedFrom James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd?oldid=637556211.
- James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd.