Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a Court of Appeals may only grant habeas corpus if a state's Supreme Court decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States" or was "based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding". The Ninth Circuit instead erred in granting relief by misapplying the Herring v. United States ruling, which involved a complete denial of a summation instead of, as in this case, a limitation on it."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- 2014_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States summary "Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a Court of Appeals may only grant habeas corpus if a state's Supreme Court decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States" or was "based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding". The Ninth Circuit instead erred in granting relief by misapplying the Herring v. United States ruling, which involved a complete denial of a summation instead of, as in this case, a limitation on it.".