Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "It is not clearly established constitutional law that a police officer must begin at a residence's front door to employ the "knock and talk" exception to the warrant requirement. The lower court therefore erred in ruling that the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity, in a lawsuit alleging they unlawfully entered the plaintiffs' property in violation of the Fourth Amendment by going into their backyard and onto their deck without a warrant. Third Circuit reversed and remanded."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- 2014_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States summary "It is not clearly established constitutional law that a police officer must begin at a residence's front door to employ the "knock and talk" exception to the warrant requirement. The lower court therefore erred in ruling that the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity, in a lawsuit alleging they unlawfully entered the plaintiffs' property in violation of the Fourth Amendment by going into their backyard and onto their deck without a warrant. Third Circuit reversed and remanded.".