Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "David Jules Enrich (born July 3, 1979) is an award-winning reporter at the Wall Street Journal. He is currently based in London, where he serves as European Banking Editor. On October 17 a British judge ordered David and the Wall Street Journal to comply with a request by the U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office prohibiting the newspaper from publishing names of individuals in the government's ongoing investigation into alleged manipulation of the London interbank offered rate. David was threatened with jail if he disobeyed. The situation was covered in the press as an example of the restrictions the media face in the U.K. from courts that impose reporting restrictions to prevent journalists from reporting details that prosecutors believe could jeopardize an investigation or case and by celebrities keen to cover up indiscretions. Dow Jones & Co., publisher of the Journal, described the injunction as "serious affront to press freedom." On October 21, an English judge said he wouldn't renew the court order saying there was "no basis" for the reporting restrictions."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- David_Enrich abstract "David Jules Enrich (born July 3, 1979) is an award-winning reporter at the Wall Street Journal. He is currently based in London, where he serves as European Banking Editor. On October 17 a British judge ordered David and the Wall Street Journal to comply with a request by the U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office prohibiting the newspaper from publishing names of individuals in the government's ongoing investigation into alleged manipulation of the London interbank offered rate. David was threatened with jail if he disobeyed. The situation was covered in the press as an example of the restrictions the media face in the U.K. from courts that impose reporting restrictions to prevent journalists from reporting details that prosecutors believe could jeopardize an investigation or case and by celebrities keen to cover up indiscretions. Dow Jones & Co., publisher of the Journal, described the injunction as "serious affront to press freedom." On October 21, an English judge said he wouldn't renew the court order saying there was "no basis" for the reporting restrictions.".