Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that State courts cannot issue rulings on federal law that contradict the decisions of federal courts, overturning a decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court held that under the Constitution, the federal courts have the final power to decide cases arising under the Constitution and federal statutes, and that the States do not have the power to overturn those decisions. Thus, Wisconsin did not have the authority to nullify federal judgments or statutes.For example, it is illegal for State officials to interfere with the work of U.S. Marshals acting under federal laws.The Ableman decision emphasized the dual form of American government and the independence of State and federal courts from one another."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Ableman_v._Booth abstract "Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that State courts cannot issue rulings on federal law that contradict the decisions of federal courts, overturning a decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court held that under the Constitution, the federal courts have the final power to decide cases arising under the Constitution and federal statutes, and that the States do not have the power to overturn those decisions. Thus, Wisconsin did not have the authority to nullify federal judgments or statutes.For example, it is illegal for State officials to interfere with the work of U.S. Marshals acting under federal laws.The Ableman decision emphasized the dual form of American government and the independence of State and federal courts from one another.".