Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/CACourts/> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 triples per page.
- CACourts accessdate "2013-07-27".
- CACourts accessdate "2014-01-22".
- CACourts court California_courts_of_appeal.
- CACourts court Supreme_Court_of_California.
- CACourts court "Cal 4th".
- CACourts court "Supreme Court of California".
- CACourts date "1898-06-20".
- CACourts date "1917-06-19".
- CACourts date "1922-07-27".
- CACourts date "1925-09-21".
- CACourts date "1951-08-27".
- CACourts date "1967-04-25".
- CACourts date "1997-06-30".
- CACourts isCitedBy Assured_Clear_Distance_Ahead.
- CACourts isCitedBy Geometric_design_of_roads.
- CACourts isCitedBy Griffin_v._California.
- CACourts isCitedBy Kaiser_Permanente.
- CACourts isCitedBy Speed_limit.
- CACourts isCitedBy Speed_limits_in_the_United_States_by_jurisdiction.
- CACourts litigants "172800.0".
- CACourts litigants "Cook v. Miller, 175 Cal. 497".
- CACourts litigants "Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.".
- CACourts litigants "Herbert v. Southern Pac. Co., 121 Cal. 227".
- CACourts litigants "People v. Edward Dean Griffin".
- CACourts opinion "227".
- CACourts opinion "294".
- CACourts opinion "451".
- CACourts opinion "497".
- CACourts publisher "Bancroft-Whitney; LexisNexis".
- CACourts publisher "Official California Reports, Vol. 189, p. 335,".
- CACourts publisher "Official California Reports, Vol. 197, p. 82".
- CACourts quote ""This is but a reiteration of the rule, in statutory form, which has always been in force without regard to a statutory promulgation to the effect that drivers or operators of vehicles, and more particularly motor vehicles, must be specially watchful in anticipation of the presence of others at places where other vehicles are constantly passing, and where men, women, and children are liable to be crossing, such as corners at the intersections of streets or other similar places or situations where people are likely to fail to observe an approaching automobile."".
- CACourts quote ""Under the circumstances of the present case -- the narrowness of the unpaved portion of the highway, the darkness of the night and the blinding of Kennell by the glare of the lights reflected from the headlights of the approaching machine -- the highway over which Kennell was traveling was beset by danger of an extraordinary character from the time his vision became so obscured as to make it impossible for him to see plainly the road before him to the time that he struck the deceased. Thus the ordinary care with which Kennell was charged in driving his car over the highway required such an amount of such care as was commensurate with the exactions of the extraordinary dangerous circumstances under which he was then operating his car. The respective rights and duties of drivers of automobiles and other vehicles and of pedestrians have repeatedly been by the courts of this state clearly pointed out.."".
- CACourts quote ""Under the circumstances of the present case—the narrowness of the unpaved portion of the highway, the darkness of the night and the blinding of Kennell by the glare of the lights reflected from the headlights of the approaching machine—the highway over which Kennell was traveling was beset by danger of an extraordinary character from the time his vision became so obscured as to make it impossible for him to see plainly the road before him to the time that he struck the deceased. Thus the ordinary care with which Kennell was charged in driving his car over the highway required such an amount of such care as was commensurate with the exactions of the extraordinary dangerous circumstances under which he was then operating his car. The respective rights and duties of drivers of automobiles and other vehicles and of pedestrians have repeatedly been by the courts of this state clearly pointed out.."".
- CACourts quote ""motor vehicles, must be specially watchful in anticipation of the presence of others at places where other vehicles are constantly passing, and where men, women, and children are liable to be crossing, such as corners at the intersections of streets or other similar places or situations where people are likely to fail to observe an approaching automobile."".
- CACourts quote "Nor is a plaintiff required to yield the right of way to one a considerable distance away whose duty it is to slow down in crossing an intersection. See Official Reports Opinions Online".
- CACourts quote "The cause of plaintiff having no time to avoid the collision was not the speed of the automobile, for it had come practically to a stop at the instant of the collision. It was his own speed that shortened his time. ... A horse can travel at the rate of fifteen miles an hour, and even faster, for a short time. But in the days of exclusively horse-drawn vehicles one who crossed a street at such a place going at fifteen miles an hour would have been considered reckless. There have been city ordinances forbidding a team from crossing a street intersection faster than a walk. Since our eyes have become somewhat accustomed to greater speed, the recklessness of fifteen miles an hour may not seem so obvious, but the danger is the same. ... A speed which carries a person twenty-two feet in one second of time at a "blind corner," with standing auto trucks projecting twelve feet into the street, obstructing the vision of the intersecting street until the last truck is reached, and with a wagon ahead of him, is not that speed which a person exercising ordinary prudence would choose at such a place, out of due regard for his own safety or that of others. Such speed may not be unusual at the present time, even under similar circumstances. But the person who receives an injury from a collision, while going at that rate under the conditions here existing, should not expect the other person to pay him the damages caused thereby.".
- CACourts quote "the cases arising from injuries suffered at railroad crossings have been so numerous, and upon certain points there has been such absolute accord, that what will constitute ordinary care in such a case had been precisely defined, and, if any element is wanting, the courts will hold as matter of law that the plaintiff has been guilty of negligence. And, when injury results which might have been avoided by the use of proper care, ... the amount of care, as well as the nature of it, has been settled.".
- CACourts reporter "Cal".
- CACourts reporter "California Official Reports, 2nd Series".
- CACourts reporter "Official California Reports".
- CACourts title "Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co., 197 Cal. 82".
- CACourts title "Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co., 189 Cal. 335".
- CACourts url CACourts.
- CACourts url "http://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/CACourts/".
- CACourts vol "106".
- CACourts vol "121".
- CACourts vol "15".
- CACourts vol "17280.0".
- CACourts vol "175".