Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq)> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 triples per page.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) abstract "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [2009] UKHL 39 is a leading case relevant for UK company law and the law on fraud and ex turpi causa non oritur actio. The House of Lords decided by a majority of three to two that where the director and sole shareholder of a closely held private company deceived the auditors with fraud carried out on all creditors, subsequently the creditors of the insolvent company would be barred from suing the auditors for negligence from the shoes of the company. The Lords reasoned that where the company was only identifiable with one person, the fraud of that person would be attributable to the company, and the \"company\" (or the creditors standing in its insolvent shoes) could not rely on its own illegal fraud when bringing a claim for negligence against any auditors. It was the last case to be argued before the House of Lords.The decision was reviewed by the Supreme Court in Jetivia SA v Bilta (UK) Limited (in liquidation).".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageExternalLink 39.html.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageExternalLink www.moorestephens.co.uk.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageID "24141331".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageLength "24403".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageOutDegree "40".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageRevisionID "707534653".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink A_fortiori_argument.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Beverley_McLachlin.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Caparo_Industries_plc_v_Dickman.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Category:2009_in_British_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Category:2009_in_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_company_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Colin_Rimer.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Commercial_Court_(England_and_Wales).
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Ex_turpi_causa_non_oritur_actio.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Hall_v_Hebert.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink High_Court_of_Australia.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink House_of_Lords.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Jetivia_SA_v_Bilta_(UK)_Limited_(in_liquidation).
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink John_Mummery.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Jonathan_Mance,_Baron_Mance.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Jonathan_Sumption.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Komerční_banka.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Law_Commission_(England_and_Wales).
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Leonard_Hoffmann,_Baron_Hoffmann.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Meridian_Global_Funds_Management_Asia_Ltd_v_Securities_Commission.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Moore_Stephens.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Multinational_Gas_and_Petrochemical_Co_v_Multinational_Gas_and_Petrochemical_Services_Ltd.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Office_of_Fair_Trading.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Ponzi_scheme.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Richard_Scott,_Baron_Scott_of_Foscote.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Robert_Walker,_Baron_Walker_of_Gestingthorpe.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Salomon_v_A_Salomon_&_Co_Ltd.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Simon_Brown,_Baron_Brown_of_Eaton-under-Heywood.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink The_Daily_Telegraph.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink Tinsley_v_Milligan.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLink United_Kingdom_company_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageWikiLinkText "Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd (in liq)".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) citations "[2009] UKHL 39, [2009] 1 AC 1391".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) court House_of_Lords.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) dateDecided "2009-07-30".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) decisionBy "Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) decisionBy "Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) decisionBy "Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) dissenting "Lord Mance".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) dissenting "Lord Scott of Foscote".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) fullName "Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) italicTitle "yes".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) judges Jonathan_Mance,_Baron_Mance.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) judges Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) judges Richard_Scott,_Baron_Scott_of_Foscote.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) judges Robert_Walker,_Baron_Walker_of_Gestingthorpe.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) judges Simon_Brown,_Baron_Brown_of_Eaton-under-Heywood.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) keywords "*fraud *illegality *attribution".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) name "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) numberOfJudges "5".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) priorActions ", setting aside".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_BAILII.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_web.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cquote.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Endash.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Harvid.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Italics_title.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Sfn.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Start_date.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) subject Category:2009_in_British_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) subject Category:2009_in_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) subject Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) subject Category:United_Kingdom_company_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) hypernym Case.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) comment "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [2009] UKHL 39 is a leading case relevant for UK company law and the law on fraud and ex turpi causa non oritur actio. The House of Lords decided by a majority of three to two that where the director and sole shareholder of a closely held private company deceived the auditors with fraud carried out on all creditors, subsequently the creditors of the insolvent company would be barred from suing the auditors for negligence from the shoes of the company.".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) label "Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd (in liq)".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) sameAs Q6908238.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) sameAs m.07k759p.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) sameAs Q6908238.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) wasDerivedFrom Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq)?oldid=707534653.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq) isPrimaryTopicOf Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd_(in_liq).