Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "United States v. Ivanov was an American court case addressing subject-matter jurisdiction for computer crimes performed by Internet users outside of the United States against American businesses and infrastructure. In trial court, Aleksey Vladimirovich Ivanov of Chelyabinsk, Russia was indicted for conspiracy, computer fraud, extortion, and possession of illegal access devices; all crimes committed against the Online Information Bureau (OIB) whose business and infrastructure were based in Vernon, Connecticut.Ivanov moved to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that \"because he was physically located in Russia when the offenses were committed, he can not be charged with violations of United States law.\" The court denied Ivanov's motion, \"first, because the intended and actual detrimental effects of Ivanov's actions in Russia occurred within the United States, and second, because each of the statutes under which Ivanov was charged with a substantive offense was intended by Congress to apply extraterritorially.\"In a later ruling, Ivanov pled guilty to several crimes, including computer intrusion and computer fraud, and was sentenced to 48 months in prison followed by 3 months of supervised release."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- United_States_v._Ivanov abstract "United States v. Ivanov was an American court case addressing subject-matter jurisdiction for computer crimes performed by Internet users outside of the United States against American businesses and infrastructure. In trial court, Aleksey Vladimirovich Ivanov of Chelyabinsk, Russia was indicted for conspiracy, computer fraud, extortion, and possession of illegal access devices; all crimes committed against the Online Information Bureau (OIB) whose business and infrastructure were based in Vernon, Connecticut.Ivanov moved to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that \"because he was physically located in Russia when the offenses were committed, he can not be charged with violations of United States law.\" The court denied Ivanov's motion, \"first, because the intended and actual detrimental effects of Ivanov's actions in Russia occurred within the United States, and second, because each of the statutes under which Ivanov was charged with a substantive offense was intended by Congress to apply extraterritorially.\"In a later ruling, Ivanov pled guilty to several crimes, including computer intrusion and computer fraud, and was sentenced to 48 months in prison followed by 3 months of supervised release.".