Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered \"serious,\" sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made. Justice David Souter dissented."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- United_States_v._Rodriquez abstract "United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered \"serious,\" sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made. Justice David Souter dissented.".
- United_States_v._Rodriquez comment "United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered \"serious,\" sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made. Justice David Souter dissented.".