Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "The Lost Liberty Hotel or Lost Liberty Inn was a proposed hotel to be built on the site of United States Supreme Court Associate Justice David Souter's properties in Weare, New Hampshire. The proposal was a reaction to the Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London (2005) decision in which Souter joined the majority ruling that the U.S. Constitution allows the use of eminent domain to condemn privately owned real property for use in private economic development projects.On March 14, 2006, a ballot initiative favoring this project was defeated by almost a three to one margin. Two candidates who had supported the initiative were not elected to the town's Board of Selectmen."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Lost_Liberty_Hotel abstract "The Lost Liberty Hotel or Lost Liberty Inn was a proposed hotel to be built on the site of United States Supreme Court Associate Justice David Souter's properties in Weare, New Hampshire. The proposal was a reaction to the Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London (2005) decision in which Souter joined the majority ruling that the U.S. Constitution allows the use of eminent domain to condemn privately owned real property for use in private economic development projects.On March 14, 2006, a ballot initiative favoring this project was defeated by almost a three to one margin. Two candidates who had supported the initiative were not elected to the town's Board of Selectmen.".
- Q16253653 abstract "The Lost Liberty Hotel or Lost Liberty Inn was a proposed hotel to be built on the site of United States Supreme Court Associate Justice David Souter's properties in Weare, New Hampshire. The proposal was a reaction to the Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London (2005) decision in which Souter joined the majority ruling that the U.S. Constitution allows the use of eminent domain to condemn privately owned real property for use in private economic development projects.On March 14, 2006, a ballot initiative favoring this project was defeated by almost a three to one margin. Two candidates who had supported the initiative were not elected to the town's Board of Selectmen.".