Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Since the First Amendment does not protect obscene speech, the ban was legitimate. However, sexual expression that is simply indecent is protected. Therefore, banning adult access to indecent messages "far exceeds that which is necessary" to shield minors from dial-a-porn services."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Sable_Communications_of_California_v._FCC holding "Since the First Amendment does not protect obscene speech, the ban was legitimate. However, sexual expression that is simply indecent is protected. Therefore, banning adult access to indecent messages "far exceeds that which is necessary" to shield minors from dial-a-porn services.".