Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism \"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.\""@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- R_v_Sussex_Justices,_ex_p_McCarthy abstract "R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism \"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.\"".
- R_v_Sussex_Justices,_ex_p_McCarthy comment "R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism \"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.\"".