Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "No Pressure is a controversial 2010 short film produced by the global warming mitigation campaign 10:10, written by Richard Curtis and Franny Armstrong, and directed by Dougal Wilson. Intended for cinema and television advertisements, No Pressure is composed of scenes in which a variety of people in every-day situations are graphically blown to pieces for failing to be sufficiently enthusiastic about the 10:10 campaign to reduce CO2 emissions. The film's makers said that they viewed No Pressure as \"a funny and satirical tongue-in-cheek little film in the over-the-top style of Monty Python or South Park\". Before its release, The Guardian described it as \"attention-grabbing\" and \"pretty edgy.\"The film was withdrawn from public circulation by 10:10, on the same day it was released, due to negative publicity. Charities that had backed the film stated they were \"absolutely appalled\" upon seeing it, and several of 10:10's corporate and strategic partners withdrew from partnership. Fox News called the film \"a blood-splattering display that has drawn anger from critics and sheepish embarrassment from its supporters.\""@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- No_Pressure_(film) abstract "No Pressure is a controversial 2010 short film produced by the global warming mitigation campaign 10:10, written by Richard Curtis and Franny Armstrong, and directed by Dougal Wilson. Intended for cinema and television advertisements, No Pressure is composed of scenes in which a variety of people in every-day situations are graphically blown to pieces for failing to be sufficiently enthusiastic about the 10:10 campaign to reduce CO2 emissions. The film's makers said that they viewed No Pressure as \"a funny and satirical tongue-in-cheek little film in the over-the-top style of Monty Python or South Park\". Before its release, The Guardian described it as \"attention-grabbing\" and \"pretty edgy.\"The film was withdrawn from public circulation by 10:10, on the same day it was released, due to negative publicity. Charities that had backed the film stated they were \"absolutely appalled\" upon seeing it, and several of 10:10's corporate and strategic partners withdrew from partnership. Fox News called the film \"a blood-splattering display that has drawn anger from critics and sheepish embarrassment from its supporters.\"".