Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Lieutenant Colonel Jane Able, et al. v. United States of America, et al.', is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that upheld the Don't ask, don't tell (DADT) (10 USC 654) law against various constitutional challenges. 88 F.3d 1280 (2nd Cir. 1996) ('\"Able I\"') 155 F.3d 628 (2nd Cir. 1998) ('\"Able II\") Both Able I and Able II overruled district court decisions striking down DADT as unconstitutional."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Able_v._United_States abstract "Lieutenant Colonel Jane Able, et al. v. United States of America, et al.', is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that upheld the Don't ask, don't tell (DADT) (10 USC 654) law against various constitutional challenges. 88 F.3d 1280 (2nd Cir. 1996) ('\"Able I\"') 155 F.3d 628 (2nd Cir. 1998) ('\"Able II\") Both Able I and Able II overruled district court decisions striking down DADT as unconstitutional.".
- Able_v._United_States comment "Lieutenant Colonel Jane Able, et al. v. United States of America, et al.', is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that upheld the Don't ask, don't tell (DADT) (10 USC 654) law against various constitutional challenges. 88 F.3d 1280 (2nd Cir. 1996) ('\"Able I\"') 155 F.3d 628 (2nd Cir. 1998) ('\"Able II\") Both Able I and Able II overruled district court decisions striking down DADT as unconstitutional.".