DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014) is a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It held that an internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal information which appears on web pages published by third parties.The outcome of the ruling is that an internet search engine must consider requests from individuals to remove links to freely accessible web pages resulting from a search on their name. Grounds for removal include cases where the search result(s) \"appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant or excessive in the light of the time that had elapsed.\" If the search engine rejects the request, the individual may ask relevant authorities to consider the case. Under certain conditions, the search engine may be ordered to remove the links from search results.The decision confirms a so-called right to be forgotten mooted in the proposed General Data Protection Regulation, due to take effect in late 2014, although the Court did not explicitly grant such a right, depending instead on the data subject's rights deriving from Article 7 (respect for private and family life) and Article 8 (protection of personal data) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. This view of internet privacy, the so-called \"European view\" championing the human rights of the subject, differs sharply from the \"American view\" championing free speech."@en }

• Google_Spain_v_AEPD_and_Mario_Costeja_González abstract "Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014) is a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It held that an internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal information which appears on web pages published by third parties.The outcome of the ruling is that an internet search engine must consider requests from individuals to remove links to freely accessible web pages resulting from a search on their name. Grounds for removal include cases where the search result(s) \"appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant or excessive in the light of the time that had elapsed.\" If the search engine rejects the request, the individual may ask relevant authorities to consider the case. Under certain conditions, the search engine may be ordered to remove the links from search results.The decision confirms a so-called right to be forgotten mooted in the proposed General Data Protection Regulation, due to take effect in late 2014, although the Court did not explicitly grant such a right, depending instead on the data subject's rights deriving from Article 7 (respect for private and family life) and Article 8 (protection of personal data) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. This view of internet privacy, the so-called \"European view\" championing the human rights of the subject, differs sharply from the \"American view\" championing free speech.".