Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom” is a 1951 book by William F. Buckley, Jr., who eventually became a leading voice in the American conservative movement in the latter half of the twentieth century.Buckley wrote the book based on his undergraduate experiences at Yale University. In the book, he criticized Yale and its faculty for forcing collectivist, Keynesian, and secularist ideology on its students. He criticized individual professors by name, arguing that they tried to break down students' religious beliefs through their hostility to religion. Buckley also states in the book that Yale was denying its students any sense of individualism by making them embrace the ideas of liberalism. Buckley argues that the Yale charter leaves oversight of the university to the alumni, and argues that because most alumni of Yale believed in God, that Yale was failing to serve its \"masters\" by teaching course content in a matter inconsistent with alumni beliefs."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- God_and_Man_at_Yale abstract "God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom” is a 1951 book by William F. Buckley, Jr., who eventually became a leading voice in the American conservative movement in the latter half of the twentieth century.Buckley wrote the book based on his undergraduate experiences at Yale University. In the book, he criticized Yale and its faculty for forcing collectivist, Keynesian, and secularist ideology on its students. He criticized individual professors by name, arguing that they tried to break down students' religious beliefs through their hostility to religion. Buckley also states in the book that Yale was denying its students any sense of individualism by making them embrace the ideas of liberalism. Buckley argues that the Yale charter leaves oversight of the university to the alumni, and argues that because most alumni of Yale believed in God, that Yale was failing to serve its \"masters\" by teaching course content in a matter inconsistent with alumni beliefs.".