Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when arbitration provisions in contracts are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal that refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between DIRECTV and its customers."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- DIRECTV,_Inc._v._Imburgia comment "DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when arbitration provisions in contracts are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal that refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between DIRECTV and its customers.".
- Q22022400 comment "DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when arbitration provisions in contracts are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal that refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between DIRECTV and its customers.".