DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Ayn Rand's Objectivism rejects an array of ideas and modes of living that it deems are primitive by nature and indicative of a primitive culture. Objectivism views primitive states of existence as being \"savage\" and marred in mysticism, fatalism, ignorance, superstition, poverty, passivity, and collectivism. The cure to such a society Objectivism holds is Western civilization, capitalism and modernity, which in its view brings with it reason, individualism, science, industrialization, and ultimately wealth.Objectivists contend that Rousseauian romanticism of primitive life became the foundation for the 1960s' counterculture and New Left, which Rand vehemently opposed. Two specific groups that Rand controversially accused of being primitive \"savages\" were Native Americans and Arabs. Rand also outlined her broader anti-primitive views in various speeches, interviews, and in her book Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. Those anti-primitive views and their relevance to Objectivism have since been expounded on by individuals such as Leonard Peikoff and Michael Berliner, newsletters like The Objectivist, and groups such as the Ayn Rand Institute and Atlas Society.Objectivism contends that by upholding reason and the value of the individual, a culture is able to reject the \"primitive mentality that cower(s) before the forces of nature\" and \"the dictates of mystical authorities.\" Peter Schwartz of the Ayn Rand Institute has argued that there is a push in the present day to restore the aforementioned \"medieval mentality\" under the guise of tribalism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. Schwartz believes that this leads to an anti-science and anti-technology mentality, which becomes subservient to the \"mysticism of religion.\" However, Frederick Cookinham in The Age of Rand: Imagining an Objectivist Future World, hypothesizes that the \"socialist/altruist claim that people lived in communist paradise and lived in harmony with the earth until modern white guys destroyed everything\" will not stand against the evidence in the future."@en }

• Objectivisms_rejection_of_the_primitive abstract "Ayn Rand's Objectivism rejects an array of ideas and modes of living that it deems are primitive by nature and indicative of a primitive culture. Objectivism views primitive states of existence as being \"savage\" and marred in mysticism, fatalism, ignorance, superstition, poverty, passivity, and collectivism. The cure to such a society Objectivism holds is Western civilization, capitalism and modernity, which in its view brings with it reason, individualism, science, industrialization, and ultimately wealth.Objectivists contend that Rousseauian romanticism of primitive life became the foundation for the 1960s' counterculture and New Left, which Rand vehemently opposed. Two specific groups that Rand controversially accused of being primitive \"savages\" were Native Americans and Arabs. Rand also outlined her broader anti-primitive views in various speeches, interviews, and in her book Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. Those anti-primitive views and their relevance to Objectivism have since been expounded on by individuals such as Leonard Peikoff and Michael Berliner, newsletters like The Objectivist, and groups such as the Ayn Rand Institute and Atlas Society.Objectivism contends that by upholding reason and the value of the individual, a culture is able to reject the \"primitive mentality that cower(s) before the forces of nature\" and \"the dictates of mystical authorities.\" Peter Schwartz of the Ayn Rand Institute has argued that there is a push in the present day to restore the aforementioned \"medieval mentality\" under the guise of tribalism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. Schwartz believes that this leads to an anti-science and anti-technology mentality, which becomes subservient to the \"mysticism of religion.\" However, Frederick Cookinham in The Age of Rand: Imagining an Objectivist Future World, hypothesizes that the \"socialist/altruist claim that people lived in communist paradise and lived in harmony with the earth until modern white guys destroyed everything\" will not stand against the evidence in the future.".