Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's Application is a judgment by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The judgment was passed down on 27 October 2006 and relates to two different appeals from decisions of the High Court. The first case involved granted to Aerotel Ltd and their infringement action against Telco Holdings Ltd and others. The second case concerned filed by Neal Macrossan but refused by the UK Patent Office (now operating as the UK Intellectual Property Office).The reasoning in the judgment forms the basis for the current practice of the UK Intellectual Property Office, when assessing whether patent applications are for patentable subject matter. The approach applied in the judgment has been criticized by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) as being \"irreconcilable with the European Patent Convention\"."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Aerotel_Ltd_v_Telco_Holdings_Ltd abstract "Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's Application is a judgment by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The judgment was passed down on 27 October 2006 and relates to two different appeals from decisions of the High Court. The first case involved granted to Aerotel Ltd and their infringement action against Telco Holdings Ltd and others. The second case concerned filed by Neal Macrossan but refused by the UK Patent Office (now operating as the UK Intellectual Property Office).The reasoning in the judgment forms the basis for the current practice of the UK Intellectual Property Office, when assessing whether patent applications are for patentable subject matter. The approach applied in the judgment has been criticized by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) as being \"irreconcilable with the European Patent Convention\".".