Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion holding that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Adkins was overturned in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937)."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 triples per page.
- Adkins_v._Childrens_Hospital abstract "Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion holding that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Adkins was overturned in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).".
- Q4683240 abstract "Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion holding that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Adkins was overturned in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).".
- Adkins_v._Childrens_Hospital comment "Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion holding that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Adkins was overturned in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).".
- Q4683240 comment "Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion holding that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract, as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Adkins was overturned in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).".