Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s ?p "AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 1999) was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which had granted summary judgment to Excel Communications, Inc. and decided that AT&T Corp. had failed to claim statutory subject matter with U.S. Patent No. 5,333,184 (the '184 patent) under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings.Along with State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, this case was the most referred case on business method patent with a 'useful concrete and tangible result' test by US Courts until Bilski v. Kappos. authoritatively overruled it."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- AT&T_Corp._v._Excel_Communications,_Inc. abstract "AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 1999) was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which had granted summary judgment to Excel Communications, Inc. and decided that AT&T Corp. had failed to claim statutory subject matter with U.S. Patent No. 5,333,184 (the '184 patent) under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings.Along with State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, this case was the most referred case on business method patent with a 'useful concrete and tangible result' test by US Courts until Bilski v. Kappos. authoritatively overruled it.".