Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Whitfield v. United States was a case that was decided 9-0 at the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 2015. The case concerned whether the forced accompaniment statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) applies when a bank, credit union, or savings/loan association robber, or attempted robber, forces someone to accompany them for any distance. Defense attorney Joshua B. Carpenter argued on behalf of the Petitioner, and Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian H. Fletcher argued on behalf of the Department of Justice."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- Whitfield_v._United_States abstract "Whitfield v. United States was a case that was decided 9-0 at the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 2015. The case concerned whether the forced accompaniment statute under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) applies when a bank, credit union, or savings/loan association robber, or attempted robber, forces someone to accompany them for any distance. Defense attorney Joshua B. Carpenter argued on behalf of the Petitioner, and Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian H. Fletcher argued on behalf of the Department of Justice.".