Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "United States v. Davis, 370 U.S. 65 (1962) is a federal income tax case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1962. It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holding:Husband's transfer of appreciated stock to his wife, pursuant to property settlement agreement executed prior to divorce, constituted a taxable event; the husband's taxable gain was measured by the stock's value at the date of its transfer.This applies the general rule, that a taxpayer recognizes a gain on the transfer of appreciated property in satisfaction of a legal obligation.In 1984, "having heard criticism of the Davis/Farid rule for many years," Congress overruled the main holding: Under §1041(a), no gain or loss shall be recognized by the transferor-spouse (or former spouse, but "only if the transfer is incident to divorce"); as a corollary, §1041(b) provides that transferor's basis shall carry over into the hands of the transferee-spouse. (Thus, for transfers between spouses, §1041(b) overrules the lower-of-cost-or-market rule for determining loss on subsequent sale of a gift, in §1015.)While this statute overrules the specific holding of Davis, it does not change the general rule—that "a taxpayer recognizes a gain on the transfer of appreciated property in satisfaction of a legal obligation."↑ ↑ ↑"@en }
Showing triples 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 triples per page.
- United_States_v._Davis_(1962) abstract "United States v. Davis, 370 U.S. 65 (1962) is a federal income tax case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1962. It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holding:Husband's transfer of appreciated stock to his wife, pursuant to property settlement agreement executed prior to divorce, constituted a taxable event; the husband's taxable gain was measured by the stock's value at the date of its transfer.This applies the general rule, that a taxpayer recognizes a gain on the transfer of appreciated property in satisfaction of a legal obligation.In 1984, "having heard criticism of the Davis/Farid rule for many years," Congress overruled the main holding: Under §1041(a), no gain or loss shall be recognized by the transferor-spouse (or former spouse, but "only if the transfer is incident to divorce"); as a corollary, §1041(b) provides that transferor's basis shall carry over into the hands of the transferee-spouse. (Thus, for transfers between spouses, §1041(b) overrules the lower-of-cost-or-market rule for determining loss on subsequent sale of a gift, in §1015.)While this statute overrules the specific holding of Davis, it does not change the general rule—that "a taxpayer recognizes a gain on the transfer of appreciated property in satisfaction of a legal obligation."↑ ↑ ↑".