Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that the patent-in-reexamination is still valid without any exceptions under 35 USC 282, even if the suggested material is not considered in the process of patent application. To reverse the presumption of validity, the plaintiff should show clear and convincing evidence."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._i4i_Ltd._Partnership abstract "Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that the patent-in-reexamination is still valid without any exceptions under 35 USC 282, even if the suggested material is not considered in the process of patent application. To reverse the presumption of validity, the plaintiff should show clear and convincing evidence.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._i4i_Ltd._Partnership comment "Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that the patent-in-reexamination is still valid without any exceptions under 35 USC 282, even if the suggested material is not considered in the process of patent application. To reverse the presumption of validity, the plaintiff should show clear and convincing evidence.".