Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s ?p "In Janetka v. Dabe, 892 F.2d 187, 190 (2d Cir.1989), the Second Circuit considered whether, under New York law, a plaintiff could satisfy the element of "favorable termination" requisite to a malicious prosecution claim when he had been acquitted on a misdemeanor charge (resisting arrest) but convicted of a less serious charge (disorderly conduct, a violation)."@en }
Showing triples 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 triples per page.
- Janetka_v._Dabe abstract "In Janetka v. Dabe, 892 F.2d 187, 190 (2d Cir.1989), the Second Circuit considered whether, under New York law, a plaintiff could satisfy the element of "favorable termination" requisite to a malicious prosecution claim when he had been acquitted on a misdemeanor charge (resisting arrest) but convicted of a less serious charge (disorderly conduct, a violation).".
- Janetka_v._Dabe comment "In Janetka v. Dabe, 892 F.2d 187, 190 (2d Cir.1989), the Second Circuit considered whether, under New York law, a plaintiff could satisfy the element of "favorable termination" requisite to a malicious prosecution claim when he had been acquitted on a misdemeanor charge (resisting arrest) but convicted of a less serious charge (disorderly conduct, a violation).".